Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Electronic Patient-Reported Data Capture as a Foundation of Rapid Learning Cancer Care
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Electronic Patient-Reported Data Capture as a Foundation of Rapid Learning Cancer Care
Do you wish to request the book?
Electronic Patient-Reported Data Capture as a Foundation of Rapid Learning Cancer Care
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Electronic Patient-Reported Data Capture as a Foundation of Rapid Learning Cancer Care
2010
Overview
Background: \"Rapid learning healthcare\" presents a new infrastructure to support comparative effectiveness research. By leveraging heterogeneous datasets (eg, clinical, administrative, genomic, registry, and research), health information technology, and sophisticated iterative analyses, rapid learning healthcare provides a real-time framework in which clinical studies can evaluate the relative impact of therapeutic approaches on a diverse array of measures. Purpose: This article describes an effort, at 1 academic medical center, to demonstrate what rapid learning healthcare might look like in operation. The article describes the process of developing and testing the components of this new model of integrated clinical/research function, with the pilot site being an academic oncology clinic and with electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) being the foundational dataset. Research Design: Steps included: feasibility study of the ePRO system; validation study of ePRO collection across 3 cancers; linking ePRO and other datasets; implementation; stakeholder alignment and buy in, and; demonstration through use cases. Subjects: Two use cases are presented; participants were metastatic breast cancer (n = 65) and gastrointestinal cancer (n = 113) patients at 2 academic medical centers. Results: (1) Patient-reported symptom data were collected with tablet computers; patients with breast and gastrointestinal cancer indicated high levels of sexual distress, which prompted multidisciplinary response, design of an intervention, and successful application for funding to study the intervention's impact. (2) The system evaluated the longitudinal impact of a psychosocial care program provided to patients with breast cancer. Participants used tablet computers to complete PRO surveys; data indicated significant impact on psychosocial outcomes, notably distress and despair, despite advanced disease. Results return to the clinic, allowing iterative update and evaluation. Conclusions: An ePRO-based rapid learning cancer clinic is feasible, providing real-time research-quality data to support comparative effectiveness research.
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc,Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
Subject
/ Breast Neoplasms - complications
/ Breast Neoplasms - pathology
/ Breast Neoplasms - psychology
/ Cancer
/ Comparative Effectiveness Research - organization & administration
/ Datasets
/ Female
/ Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - complications
/ Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - psychology
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Medical Records Systems, Computerized - organization & administration
/ Oncology
/ Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological - etiology
/ Stress, Psychological - etiology
/ Symptoms
