Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial
Do you wish to request the book?
Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial
2018
Overview
Aim
This was to compare and evaluate the instrumentation time and quality of obturation between paediatric rotary file (Kedo-S) and manual instrumentation techniques in primary molars.
Methods
A double blinded randomised control trial was performed that included mandibular primary molars in children of age 4–7 years with pulp necrosis. Sixty primary mandibular molars were randomly divided into two groups: 30 were instrumented with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (experimental group) and 30 with hand K-files (control group). During the preparation of the primary root canals the instrumentation time was recorded in seconds. The quality of obturation was recorded as optimal, under filled or over filled using immediate post-operative radiographs. The instrumentation time and quality of obturation were analysed using independent t-test and Chi-square test.
Results
Mean instrumentation time with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (78.53 s) was significantly less than K-files (95.46 s) (p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in the quality of obturation (p < 0.05) with paediatric rotary files (Kedo-S).
Conclusion
Clinical use of paediatric rotary files Kedo-S was effective during root canal preparation of primary teeth with reduction in instrumentation time and better quality of obturation.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
