MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Method in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Interim Analysis
Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Method in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Interim Analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Method in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Interim Analysis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Method in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Interim Analysis
Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Method in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Interim Analysis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Method in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Interim Analysis
Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Method in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Interim Analysis
Journal Article

Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Method in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: An Interim Analysis

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the SLN identification rate is lower and has a higher false-negative rate than that at upfront surgery. This clinical trial aimed to confirm the effectiveness of sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery by determining the lymph node identification rate using multimodal SLN marker methods in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing NAC. Patients and Methods This clinical study is a prospective single-center randomized controlled trial involving patients with breast cancer receiving NAC. Patients are randomized (1:1:1) into arm A that involves the use of radioisotope (RI) plus indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG-F); arm B, RI plus vital dye; and, arm C, ICG-F plus vital dye. A total of 348 patients are needed. An interim analysis was performed on 50% of the patients enrolled. The primary outcome of this trial was the SLN identification rate. Results Among the 164 total patients (median age 51 years), T2 and N1 were the most common clinical stages. The identification rate of SLN was 95% in arm A, 92% in arm B, and 79% in arm C. To assess superior efficacy, the one-sided endpoint was set at α < 0.0056. Arms A and C showed a difference of 0.1597 in the detection rate ( p = 0.0055). Conclusions The use of ICG-F plus vital dye for SLNB was the least effective. The results show that the choice of tracer should be radioisotope in combination with one of the other tracers to have the highest SLN identification rate when SLNB cannot be implemented conventionally due to the circumstances of each institution.