Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluation of GNSS-TEC Data-Driven IRI-2016 Model for Electron Density
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluation of GNSS-TEC Data-Driven IRI-2016 Model for Electron Density
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluation of GNSS-TEC Data-Driven IRI-2016 Model for Electron Density
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Evaluation of GNSS-TEC Data-Driven IRI-2016 Model for Electron Density
2024
Overview
The ionosphere is one of the important error sources that affect the communication of radio signals. The international reference ionosphere (IRI) model is a commonly used model to describe ionospheric parameters. The driving parameter IG12 of the IRI-2016 model was optimally updated based on GNSS-TEC data from 2015 and 2019. The electron density profiles and NmF2 calculated by the IRI-2016 model (upda-IRI-2016) driven by the updated IG12 value (IG-up) were evaluated for their accuracy using ionosonde observations and COSMIC inversion data. The experiments show that both the electron density profiles and NmF2 calculated by upda-IRI-2016 driven by IG-up show significant optimization effects, compared to the IRI-2016 model driven by IG12. For electron density, the precision improvement (PI) for both MAE and RMSE at the Beijing station exceed 31.2% in January 2015 and 16.0% in January 2019. While the PI of MAE and RMSE at the Wuhan station, which is located at a lower latitude, both exceed 32.5% in January 2015, both exceed 42.1% in January 2019, which is significantly higher than that of the Beijing station. In 2015, the PI of MAE and RMSE compared with COSMIC are both higher than 20%. For NmF2, the PI is greater for low solar activity years and low latitude stations, with the Wuhan station showing a PI of more than 11.7% in January 2019 compared to January 2015. The PI compared to COSMIC was higher than 17.2% in 2015.
Publisher
MDPI AG
