Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Development of an Area Scan Step Length Measuring System Using a Polynomial Estimate of the Heel Cloud Point
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Development of an Area Scan Step Length Measuring System Using a Polynomial Estimate of the Heel Cloud Point
Do you wish to request the book?
Development of an Area Scan Step Length Measuring System Using a Polynomial Estimate of the Heel Cloud Point
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Development of an Area Scan Step Length Measuring System Using a Polynomial Estimate of the Heel Cloud Point
2022
Overview
Due to impaired mobility caused by aging, it is very important to employ early detection and monitoring of gait parameters to prevent the inevitable huge amount of medical cost at a later age. For gait training and potential tele-monitoring application outside clinical settings, low-cost yet highly reliable gait analysis systems are needed. This research proposes using a single LiDAR system to perform automatic gait analysis with polynomial fitting. The experimental setup for this study consists of two different walking speeds, fast walk and normal walk, along a 5-m straight line. There were ten test subjects (mean age 28, SD 5.2) who voluntarily participated in the study. We performed polynomial fitting to estimate the step length from the heel projection cloud point laser data as the subject walks forwards and compared the values with the visual inspection method. The results showed that the visual inspection method is accurate up to 6 cm while the polynomial method achieves 8 cm in the worst case (fast walking). With the accuracy difference estimated to be at most 2 cm, the polynomial method provides reliability of heel location estimation as compared with the observational gait analysis. The proposed method in this study presents an improvement accuracy of 4% as opposed to the proposed dual-laser range sensor method that reported 57.87 cm ± 10.48, an error of 10%. Meanwhile, our proposed method reported ±0.0633 m, a 6% error for normal walking.
Publisher
MDPI AG
