MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
American Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics Award 2022: Computer models do not accurately predict human muscle passive muscle force and fiber length: Evaluating subject-specific modeling impact on musculoskeletal model predictions
American Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics Award 2022: Computer models do not accurately predict human muscle passive muscle force and fiber length: Evaluating subject-specific modeling impact on musculoskeletal model predictions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
American Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics Award 2022: Computer models do not accurately predict human muscle passive muscle force and fiber length: Evaluating subject-specific modeling impact on musculoskeletal model predictions
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
American Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics Award 2022: Computer models do not accurately predict human muscle passive muscle force and fiber length: Evaluating subject-specific modeling impact on musculoskeletal model predictions
American Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics Award 2022: Computer models do not accurately predict human muscle passive muscle force and fiber length: Evaluating subject-specific modeling impact on musculoskeletal model predictions

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
American Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics Award 2022: Computer models do not accurately predict human muscle passive muscle force and fiber length: Evaluating subject-specific modeling impact on musculoskeletal model predictions
American Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics Award 2022: Computer models do not accurately predict human muscle passive muscle force and fiber length: Evaluating subject-specific modeling impact on musculoskeletal model predictions
Journal Article

American Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics Award 2022: Computer models do not accurately predict human muscle passive muscle force and fiber length: Evaluating subject-specific modeling impact on musculoskeletal model predictions

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Musculoskeletal models are valuable for studying and understanding the human body in a variety of clinical applications that include surgical planning, injury prevention, and prosthetic design. Subject-specific models have proven to be more accurate and useful compared to generic models. Nevertheless, it is important to validate all models when possible. To this end, gracilis muscle–tendon parameters were directly measured intraoperatively and used to test model predictions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits and limitations of systematically incorporating subject-specific variables into muscle models used to predict passive force and fiber length. The results showed that incorporating subject-specific values generally reduced errors, although significant errors still existed. Optimization of the modeling parameter “tendon slack length” was explored in two cases: minimizing fiber length error and minimizing passive force error. The results showed that using all subject-specific values yielded the most favorable outcome in both models and optimization cases. However, the trade-off between fiber length error and passive force error will depend on the specific circumstances and research objectives due to significant individual errors. Notably, individual fiber length and passive force errors were as high as 20% and 37% respectively. Finally, the modeling parameter “tendon slack length” did not correlate with any real-world anatomical length.