Journal Article

External Human–Machine Interfaces: The Effect of Display Location on Crossing Intentions and Eye Movements

Hensen, M. T. T., Eisma, Y. B., van Bergen, S., ter Brake, S. M., Tempelaar, W. J., de Winter, J. C. F.

2020

Overview

In the future, automated cars may feature external human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) to communicate relevant information to other road users. However, it is currently unknown where on the car the eHMI should be placed. In this study, 61 participants each viewed 36 animations of cars with eHMIs on either the roof, windscreen, grill, above the wheels, or a projection on the road. The eHMI showed ‘Waiting’ combined with a walking symbol 1.2 s before the car started to slow down, or ‘Driving’ while the car continued driving. Participants had to press and hold the spacebar when they felt it safe to cross. Results showed that, averaged over the period when the car approached and slowed down, the roof, windscreen, and grill eHMIs yielded the best performance (i.e., the highest spacebar press time). The projection and wheels eHMIs scored relatively poorly, yet still better than no eHMI. The wheels eHMI received a relatively high percentage of spacebar presses when the car appeared from a corner, a situation in which the roof, windscreen, and grill eHMIs were out of view. Eye-tracking analyses showed that the projection yielded dispersed eye movements, as participants scanned back and forth between the projection and the car. It is concluded that eHMIs should be presented on multiple sides of the car. A projection on the road is visually effortful for pedestrians, as it causes them to divide their attention between the projection and the car itself.

• Publisher: MDPI AG
• Subject: attention distribution / automated driving / Automation / Automobiles / Design / driverless vehicles / Driving / ehmi / Experiments / Eye movements / eye-tracking / Pedestrians / Projection / road safety / Roofs / Vehicles / Verbal communication / Windshields