Journal Article

Does the Rational Function Model’s Accuracy for GF1 and GF6 WFV Images Satisfy Practical Requirements?

Shan, Xiaojun, Zhang, Jingyi

2023

Overview

The Gaofen-1 (GF-1) and Gaofen-6 (GF-6) satellites have acquired many GF-1 and GF-6 wide-field-view (WFV) images. These images have been made available for free use globally. The GF-1 WFV (GF-1) and GF-6 WFV (GF-6) images have rational polynomial coefficients (RPCs). In practical applications, RPC corrections of GF-1 and GF-6 images need to be completed using the rational function model (RFM). However, can the accuracy of the rational function model satisfy practical application requirements? To address this issue, a geometric accuracy method was proposed in this paper to evaluate the accuracy of the RFM of GF-1 and GF-6 images. First, RPC corrections were completed using the RFM and refined RFM, respectively. The RFM was constructed using the RPCs and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 90 m DEM. The RFM was refined via affine transformation based on control points (CPs), which resulted in a refined RFM. Then, an automatic matching method was proposed to complete the automatic matching of GF-1/GF-6 images and reference images, which enabled us to obtain many uniformly distributed CPs. Finally, these CPs were used to evaluate the geometric accuracy of the RFM and refined RFM. The 14th-layer Google images of the corresponding area were used as reference images. In the experiments, the advantages and disadvantages of BRIEF, SIFT, and the proposed method were first compared. Then, the values of the root mean square error (RSME) of 10,561 Chinese, French, and Brazilian GF-1 and GF-6 images were calculated and statistically analyzed, and the local geometric distortions of the GF-1 and GF-6 images were evaluated; these were used to evaluate the accuracy of the RFM. Last, the accuracy of the refined RFM was evaluated using the eight GF-1 and GF-6 images. The experimental results indicate that the accuracy of the RFM for most GF-1 and GF-6 images cannot meet the actual use requirement of being better than 1.0 pixel, the accuracy of the refined RFM for GF-1 images cannot meet practical requirement of being better than 1.0 pixel, and the accuracy of the refined RFM for most GF-6 images meets the practical requirement of being better than 1.0 pixel. However, the RMSE values that meet the requirements are between 0.9 and 1.0, and the geometric accuracy can be further improved.

• Publisher: MDPI AG
• Subject: Accuracy / Affine transformations / automatic matching / Calibration / Cameras / Comparative analysis / Geometric accuracy / geometric accuracy evaluation / Geometric rectification (imagery) / geometry / GF-1 WFV image / GF-6 WFV image / Image acquisition / Matching / Mean square errors / Methods / Model accuracy / Pixels / Polynomials / radar / rational function model / Rational functions / Remote sensing / Satellite imaging / Sensors / Similarity measures / Technology application / topography