Journal Article

Migratory plasticity is not ubiquitous among large herbivores

Sawyer, Hall, Monteith, Kevin L., Dwinnell, Samantha P. H., Middleton, Arthur D., Merkle, Jerod A.

2019

Overview

The migratory movements of wild animals can promote abundance and support ecosystem functioning. For large herbivores, mounting evidence suggests that migratory behaviour is an individually variable trait, where individuals can easily switch between migrant and resident tactics. The degree of migratory plasticity, including whether and where to migrate, has important implications for the ecology and conservation of large herbivores in a changing world. Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) are an iconic species of western North America, but are notably absent from the body of literature that suggests large herbivore migrations are highly plastic. We evaluated plasticity of migration in female mule deer using longitudinal GPS data collected from 312 individuals across nine populations in the western United States, including 882 animal‐years (801 migrants and 81 residents). We followed both resident and migratory mule deer through time to determine whether individual animals switched migratory behaviours (i.e., whether to migrate) from migratory to residency or vice versa. Additionally, we examined the fidelity of individuals to their migration routes (i.e., where to migrate) to determine whether they used the same routes year after year. We also evaluated whether age and reproductive status affected propensity to migrate or fidelity to migratory routes. Our results indicate that mule deer, unlike other large herbivores, have little or no plasticity in terms of whether or where they migrate. Resident deer remained residents, and migrant deer remained migrants, regardless of age, reproductive status or number of years monitored. Further, migratory individuals showed strong fidelity (>80%) to their migration routes year after year. Our study clearly shows that migration plasticity is not ubiquitous among large herbivores. Because of their rigid migratory behaviour, mule deer may not adapt to changing environmental conditions as readily as large herbivores with more plastic migratory behaviour (e.g., elk). The fixed migratory behaviours of mule deer make clear that conservation efforts aimed at traditional seasonal ranges and migration routes are warranted for sustaining this iconic species that continues to decline across its range. This study reveals that mule deer, unlike many other large herbivores, have little or no plasticity in terms of whether or where they migrate. The authors found resident deer remained residents, and migrant deer remained migrants, regardless of age, reproductive status or number of years monitored.

• Publisher: Wiley,Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subject: Animal Migration / Animals / Behavior / behavioural plasticity / Conservation / Deer / Ecological function / Ecosystem / Elk / Environmental changes / Environmental conditions / facultative migration / Female / fidelity / Global positioning systems / GPS / Herbivores / Herbivory / Migrants / migration / mule deer / North America / Odocoileus / partial migration / Plastic properties / Plasticity / Reproductive status / RESEARCH ARTICLE / Seasons / switching behaviour / Tactics / ungulate / Wild animals