Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Soil Moisture Prediction Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review on Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Soil Moisture Prediction Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review on Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities
Do you wish to request the book?
Soil Moisture Prediction Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review on Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Soil Moisture Prediction Using Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review on Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities
2025
Overview
Machine learning (ML) has gained significant attention for unraveling the complex, nonlinear relationships between soil moisture (SM) and various predictive variables, including remote sensing (RS; reflectance, brightness temperature, backscatter coefficients) and biophysical (topographic, soil, vegetation, and weather) variables. We reviewed the literature to extract and synthesize ML algorithms, reliable input features, and challenges in SM estimation using RS data. We analyzed results from 144 articles published from 2010 to 2024. Random forest (40 out of 67 studies), support vector regressor (13 out of 39 studies), and artificial neural networks (12 out of 27 studies) often outperformed other algorithms to estimate SM using RS datasets. Multi-source RS data often outperformed single-source data in SM estimation. Satellite-derived features, such as vegetation indices and backscattering coefficients, provided critical information on surface SM (SSM) variability to estimate SSM. For root zone SM estimation, soil properties and SSM generally were more reliable predictors than surface information derived solely from RS. Two recent advances—the use of semi-empirical models and L-band SAR to mitigate vegetation effects, and transfer learning to improve model transferability—have shown promise in addressing key challenges in SM estimation.
