Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Non‐native congeneric trees are poor‐quality host plants for a larval Lepidopteran
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Non‐native congeneric trees are poor‐quality host plants for a larval Lepidopteran
Do you wish to request the book?
Non‐native congeneric trees are poor‐quality host plants for a larval Lepidopteran
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Non‐native congeneric trees are poor‐quality host plants for a larval Lepidopteran
2025
Overview
In managed ecosystems, cultivated plant diversity is a collection of native and introduced species composed of varying plant origins across scales: locally native, non‐locally native, and non‐native. Non‐local and non‐native plant species may be ill‐suited as host plants for locally native insects. Yet, we lack information on the population‐ and individual‐level consequences of introduced plants to phytophagous insects. Promethea moth (Callosamia promethea) is a Lepidopteran species regionally specialized to Prunus in the Northeastern United States. Here, we used a rearing experiment to compare Promethea caterpillar performance on 14 different Prunus host plants commonly found naturally and in horticulture and two non‐hosts. Across all measures, Prunus serotina supported the highest survival, fastest growth, and largest larval biomass. We found little difference between locally native and non‐local Prunus across most measures; however, few non‐native Prunus supported living larvae to the fifth instar, and surviving larvae had reduced growth and biomass. Our results indicate that non‐native congeners are poor replacements for locally native tree species in supporting specialized Lepidoptera. However, non‐local, regionally native species in cultivation may serve as adequate, albeit suboptimal, host plants. These results further our understanding of how selection for plant traits or species impacts biodiversity in novel and managed ecosystems.
