Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluating the utility of ChatGPT in addressing conceptual and non-conceptual questions related to urodynamic quality control and trace analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluating the utility of ChatGPT in addressing conceptual and non-conceptual questions related to urodynamic quality control and trace analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluating the utility of ChatGPT in addressing conceptual and non-conceptual questions related to urodynamic quality control and trace analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Evaluating the utility of ChatGPT in addressing conceptual and non-conceptual questions related to urodynamic quality control and trace analysis
2025
Overview
To investigate the applicability of ChatGPT, in answering conceptual and non-conceptual questions related to urodynamic quality control, including trace analysis and report interpretation. Utilizing a structured questioning approach, the study employs ChatGPT3.5 and ChatGPT4.0. Questions are mainly divided into conceptual questions and non-conceptual questions related to urodynamic quality control, and trace analysis. Evaluation criteria include alignment with the “Good Urodynamic Practice” guideline and literature. ChatGPT excels in delivering hierarchical responses to conceptual questions, providing comprehensive insights in a structured format. Challenges arise in offering specific references to published literature, with a 50% accuracy rate in 10 basic conceptual questions. For non-conceptual urodynamic quality control questions, ChatGPT achieves a 50% accuracy rate, accurately addressing various aspects. However, in both cases, we found no statistically significant difference in accuracy rate between conceptual questions and non-conceptual questions. However, challenges persist when questions are linked to recent literature, leading to misunderstandings and inaccurate responses. Regarding urodynamics trace interpretation, ChatGPT states its inability to directly analyze images, emphasizing reliance on qualified healthcare professionals for detailed clinical analysis. This study preliminarily demonstrates ChatGPT’s limited performance in answering conceptual and non-conceptual questions related to urodynamic quality control, without finding significant differences between the two kinds of questions. Additionally, ChatGPT’s capability to process image data for urodynamic trace analysis is non-existent. The study suggests that ChatGPT only has the potential to serve as an \"electronic dictionary” to aid urodynamic operators, but it should be noted that this study cannot prove ChatGPT’s ability to change the overall quality of urodynamic examinations.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
Subject
