Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The incidence of dermatitis following application of foam tape in healthy volunteers-A prospective trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The incidence of dermatitis following application of foam tape in healthy volunteers-A prospective trial
Do you wish to request the book?
The incidence of dermatitis following application of foam tape in healthy volunteers-A prospective trial
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The incidence of dermatitis following application of foam tape in healthy volunteers-A prospective trial
2024
Overview
Foam tape is commonly used in the emergency department as a dressing over chest tubes owing to its occlusive and compressible properties. There is a paucity of data regarding the incidence of significant cutaneous reactions to this material. We conducted a prospective trial to evaluate the incidence of dermatitis following application of foam tape to the upper arm of a cohort of healthy volunteers.
This was a prospective, interventional trial. We enrolled a cohort of consenting, healthy physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff at a teaching facility who did not have known hypersensitivity to foam tape. Study investigators applied a 2 × 2 inch piece of 3 M microfoam adhesive to the medial aspect of each subject's upper arm. The contralateral arm served as a reference for comparison. The adhesive remained in place for 48 h and the study authors assessed patients utilizing the previously validated Cutaneous Irritancy Scoring System (CISS). Categorical variables analyzed by chi-square, continuous variables with t-tests.
There were 40 subjects in the study group; 52% female, mean age 40±7 years, 55% non-White race. 10/40 (25%; 95%CI[14%, 41%]) of subjects had erythema; 9/40 (22%) had an erythema score of 1 and 1/40 (2.5%) had a score of 2. With respect to edema, 2/40 (5%; 95% CI[1%,18%]); 1/40(2.5%) had an edema score of 1, and 1/40(2.5%) had a score of 2. There were 9/40 subjects with an irritancy score > 0; (22%; 95%CI[12%,38%]); 7/40(18%) had an irritancy score of 1, and 2/4(5.0%) had a score of 2. In terms of the severity score, 10/40 (25%; 95%CI[14%, 41%]) had a score > 0; 9/40(22%) had a score of 1, and 1/40(2.5%) had a score of 2. Overall, 10/40 (25%; 95%CI[14%, 41%]) of subjects had at least one positive measure of a reaction of any kind. Subjects' age, gender and race were not found to be statistically significantly associated with the incidence of erythema, edema, or irritancy. In addition, these characteristics were not statistically significantly associated with severity score > 0. The p values for all the above bivariate analyses were > 0.05.
Cutaneous reactions occurred in 25% of healthy volunteers after the application of foam tape to the arm. Patient characteristics were not associated with risk of a skin reaction.
Clinical trials registration: #NCT06059417
