Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Molecular Characterization of Polyomavirus-Positive and Negative Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Molecular Characterization of Polyomavirus-Positive and Negative Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Do you wish to request the book?
Molecular Characterization of Polyomavirus-Positive and Negative Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Molecular Characterization of Polyomavirus-Positive and Negative Merkel Cell Carcinoma
2025
Overview
Background/Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are frontline treatment for advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC), regardless of viral status. Frontline ICIs provide durable benefit to only half of patients, highlighting a need for alternative therapies. In this study, the objective is to leverage whole exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptome sequencing (WTS) to distinguish genomic alterations associated with ICI response. Investigate differential genomic alterations between virus-positive (VP) and virus-negative (VN)-MCC to identify novel therapeutic targets. Methods: A total of 95 MCC cases underwent WES and WTS. Utilizing computational pipelines applied to WES, we identified viral status and tumor mutational burden (TMB). RNA-seq data was used to characterize the immune microenvironment. Results: Of 95 MCC cases, 57 (60%) were VP-MCC and 38 (40%) were VN-MCC. Median TMB was higher in VN-MCC (27.5 vs. 1 Muts/Mb). Mutations in TP53, RB1, NOTCH1, KMTD2, KMT2C, and PIK3CA were primarily found in VN-MCC. MAPK Pathway Activity Score, NK cell infiltration, and the immune checkpoint gene CD276 in VN-MCC tumors were upregulated. No overall survival (OS) difference was identified between VP and VN-MCC, even after ICIs. Conclusions: MCC oncogenesis and treatment response transcend viral status. While mutational analysis confirms previous findings, assessment of the transcriptome and tumor microenvironment suggests alternate therapeutic targets.
