Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care
by
Holmes, Ann
, Twaddle, Sara
, Gilmour, W Harper
, Lunan, C Burnett
, Shields, Noreen
, Johnstone, Irene
, Mcllwaine, Gillian
, Cheyne, Helen
, Geer, Ian
, Tumbull, Deborah
, McGinley, Mary
, Reid, Margaret
in
Adult
/ Delivery, Obstetric - methods
/ Female
/ Health care
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Medical research
/ Midwifery
/ Midwifery - methods
/ Obstetrics - methods
/ Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
/ Patient Care Team
/ Patient Satisfaction
/ Postnatal Care
/ Pregnancy
/ Prenatal Care - methods
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
1996
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care
by
Holmes, Ann
, Twaddle, Sara
, Gilmour, W Harper
, Lunan, C Burnett
, Shields, Noreen
, Johnstone, Irene
, Mcllwaine, Gillian
, Cheyne, Helen
, Geer, Ian
, Tumbull, Deborah
, McGinley, Mary
, Reid, Margaret
in
Adult
/ Delivery, Obstetric - methods
/ Female
/ Health care
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Medical research
/ Midwifery
/ Midwifery - methods
/ Obstetrics - methods
/ Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
/ Patient Care Team
/ Patient Satisfaction
/ Postnatal Care
/ Pregnancy
/ Prenatal Care - methods
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
1996
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care
by
Holmes, Ann
, Twaddle, Sara
, Gilmour, W Harper
, Lunan, C Burnett
, Shields, Noreen
, Johnstone, Irene
, Mcllwaine, Gillian
, Cheyne, Helen
, Geer, Ian
, Tumbull, Deborah
, McGinley, Mary
, Reid, Margaret
in
Adult
/ Delivery, Obstetric - methods
/ Female
/ Health care
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Medical research
/ Midwifery
/ Midwifery - methods
/ Obstetrics - methods
/ Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
/ Patient Care Team
/ Patient Satisfaction
/ Postnatal Care
/ Pregnancy
/ Prenatal Care - methods
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
1996
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care
Journal Article
Randomised, controlled trial of efficacy of midwife-managed care
1996
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Midwife-managed programmes of care are being widely implemented although there has been little investigation of their efficacy. We have compared midwife-managed care with shared care (ie, care divided among midwives, hospital doctors, and general practitioners) in terms of clinical efficacy and women's satisfaction.
We carried out a randomised controlled trial of 1 299 pregnant women who had no adverse characteristics at booking (consent rate 81·9%). 648 women were assigned midwife-managed care and 651 shared care. The research hypothesis was that compared with shared care, midwife-managed care would produce fewer interventions, similar (or more favourable) outcomes, similar complications, and greater satisfaction with care. Data were collected by retrospective review of case records and self-report questionnaires. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Interventions were similar in the two groups or lower with midwife-managed care. For example, women in the midwife-managed group were less likely than women in shared care to have induction of labour (146 [23·9%]
vs 199 [33·3%]; 95% CI for difference 4·4–14·5). Women in the midwife-managed group were more likely to have an intact perineum and less likely to have had an episiotomy (p=0·02), with no significant difference in perineal tears. Complication rates were similar. Overall, 32·8% of women were permanently transferred from midwife-managed care (28·7% for clinical reasons, 3·7% for non-clinical reasons). Women in both groups reported satisfaction with their care but the midwife-managed group were significantly more satisfied with their antenatal (difference in mean scores 0·48 [95% CI 0·41–0·55]), intrapartum (0·28 [0·18–0·37]), hospital-based postnatal care (0·57 [0·45–0·70]), and home-based postnatal care (0·33 [0·25–0·42]).
We conclude that midwife-managed care for healthy women, integrated within existing services, is clinically effective and enhances women's satisfaction with maternity care.
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd,Elsevier Limited
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.