Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of Satellite-Observed XCO2 from GOSAT, OCO-2, and Ground-Based TCCON
by
Wei Gong
, Ge Han
, Chengzhi Xiang
, Ailin Liang
in
Air pollution
/ Carbon
/ Carbon cycle
/ Carbon dioxide
/ Errors
/ GOSAT
/ Greenhouse effect
/ Greenhouse gases
/ Line shape
/ Mean
/ OCO-2
/ OCO-2; GOSAT; XCO2; TCCON; carbon dioxide; validation
/ Passive satellites
/ Q
/ Remote sensing
/ Satellite observation
/ Satellites
/ Science
/ Seasonal variations
/ Standard deviation
/ TCCON
/ validation
/ XCO2
2017
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of Satellite-Observed XCO2 from GOSAT, OCO-2, and Ground-Based TCCON
by
Wei Gong
, Ge Han
, Chengzhi Xiang
, Ailin Liang
in
Air pollution
/ Carbon
/ Carbon cycle
/ Carbon dioxide
/ Errors
/ GOSAT
/ Greenhouse effect
/ Greenhouse gases
/ Line shape
/ Mean
/ OCO-2
/ OCO-2; GOSAT; XCO2; TCCON; carbon dioxide; validation
/ Passive satellites
/ Q
/ Remote sensing
/ Satellite observation
/ Satellites
/ Science
/ Seasonal variations
/ Standard deviation
/ TCCON
/ validation
/ XCO2
2017
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of Satellite-Observed XCO2 from GOSAT, OCO-2, and Ground-Based TCCON
by
Wei Gong
, Ge Han
, Chengzhi Xiang
, Ailin Liang
in
Air pollution
/ Carbon
/ Carbon cycle
/ Carbon dioxide
/ Errors
/ GOSAT
/ Greenhouse effect
/ Greenhouse gases
/ Line shape
/ Mean
/ OCO-2
/ OCO-2; GOSAT; XCO2; TCCON; carbon dioxide; validation
/ Passive satellites
/ Q
/ Remote sensing
/ Satellite observation
/ Satellites
/ Science
/ Seasonal variations
/ Standard deviation
/ TCCON
/ validation
/ XCO2
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of Satellite-Observed XCO2 from GOSAT, OCO-2, and Ground-Based TCCON
Journal Article
Comparison of Satellite-Observed XCO2 from GOSAT, OCO-2, and Ground-Based TCCON
2017
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
CO2 is one of the most important greenhouse gases. Its concentration and distribution in the atmosphere have always been important in studying the carbon cycle and the greenhouse effect. This study is the first to validate the XCO2 of satellite observations with total carbon column observing network (TCCON) data and to compare the global XCO2 distribution for the passive satellites Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), which are on-orbit greenhouse gas satellites. Results show that since GOSAT was launched in 2009, its mean measurement accuracy was −0.4107 ppm with an error standard deviation of 2.216 ppm since 2009, and has since decreased to −0.62 ppm with an error standard deviation of 2.3 ppm during the past two more years (2014–2016), while the mean measurement accuracy of the OCO-2 was 0.2671 ppm with an error standard deviation of 1.56 ppm from September 2014 to December 2016. GOSAT observations have recently decreased and lagged behind OCO-2 on the ability to monitor the global distribution and monthly detection of XCO2. Furthermore, the XCO2 values gathered by OCO-2 are higher by an average of 1.765 ppm than those by GOSAT. Comparison of the latitude gradient characteristics, seasonal fluctuation amplitude, and annual growth trend of the monthly mean XCO2 distribution also showed differences in values but similar line shapes between OCO-2 and GOSAT. When compared with the NOAA statistics, both satellites’ measurements reflect the growth trend of the global XCO2 at a low and smooth level, and reflect the seasonal fluctuation with an absolutely different line shape.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.