Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Estimating bias in derived body mass index in the Maternity Experiences Survey
by
Duggan, J.
, Kirby, R. S.
, Dzakpasu, S.
, Fahey, J.
in
Adult
/ Bias
/ Birth Weight
/ Body Mass Index
/ body mass index, self-reported prepregnancy weight, self-reported height, reproductive outcomes, validity
/ Canada - epidemiology
/ Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data
/ Diagnostic Self Evaluation
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Obesity - diagnosis
/ Obesity - epidemiology
/ Obesity - prevention & control
/ Pregnancy
/ Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
/ Prevalence
/ Random Allocation
/ Self Report
/ Statistics as Topic
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Estimating bias in derived body mass index in the Maternity Experiences Survey
by
Duggan, J.
, Kirby, R. S.
, Dzakpasu, S.
, Fahey, J.
in
Adult
/ Bias
/ Birth Weight
/ Body Mass Index
/ body mass index, self-reported prepregnancy weight, self-reported height, reproductive outcomes, validity
/ Canada - epidemiology
/ Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data
/ Diagnostic Self Evaluation
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Obesity - diagnosis
/ Obesity - epidemiology
/ Obesity - prevention & control
/ Pregnancy
/ Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
/ Prevalence
/ Random Allocation
/ Self Report
/ Statistics as Topic
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
2016
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Estimating bias in derived body mass index in the Maternity Experiences Survey
by
Duggan, J.
, Kirby, R. S.
, Dzakpasu, S.
, Fahey, J.
in
Adult
/ Bias
/ Birth Weight
/ Body Mass Index
/ body mass index, self-reported prepregnancy weight, self-reported height, reproductive outcomes, validity
/ Canada - epidemiology
/ Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data
/ Diagnostic Self Evaluation
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Obesity - diagnosis
/ Obesity - epidemiology
/ Obesity - prevention & control
/ Pregnancy
/ Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
/ Prevalence
/ Random Allocation
/ Self Report
/ Statistics as Topic
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Estimating bias in derived body mass index in the Maternity Experiences Survey
Journal Article
Estimating bias in derived body mass index in the Maternity Experiences Survey
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The objective of this study was to assess bias in the body mass index (BMI) measure in the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey (MES) and possible implications of bias on the relationship between BMI and selected pregnancy outcomes.
We assessed BMI classification based on self-reported versus measured values. We used a random sample of 6175 women from the MES, which derived BMI from self-reported height and weight, and a random sample of 259 women who had previously given birth from the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS), which derived BMI from self-reported and measured height and weight. Two correction equations were applied to self-reported based BMI, and the impact of these corrections on associations between BMI and caesarean section, small-for-gestational age (SGA) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) births was studied.
Overall, 86.9% of the CHMS subsample was classified into the same BMI category based on self-reported versus measured data. However, misclassification had a substantial effect on the proportion of women in underweight and obese BMI categories. For example, 14.5% versus 20.8% of women were classified as obese based on self-reported data versus measured data. Corrections improved estimates of obesity prevalence, but over- and underestimated other BMI categories. Corrections had nonsignificant effects on the associations between BMI and SGA, LGA, and caesarean section.
While there was high concordance in BMI classification based on selfreported versus measured height and weight, bias in self-reported based measures may slightly over- or underestimate the risks associated with a particular BMI class. However, the general trend in associations is unaffected.
Publisher
Public Health Agency of Canada
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.