Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
ASYMMETRIES IN THE PROSODIC PHRASING OF FUNCTION WORDS: ANOTHER LOOK AT THE SUFFIXING PREFERENCE
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
ASYMMETRIES IN THE PROSODIC PHRASING OF FUNCTION WORDS: ANOTHER LOOK AT THE SUFFIXING PREFERENCE
Do you wish to request the book?
ASYMMETRIES IN THE PROSODIC PHRASING OF FUNCTION WORDS: ANOTHER LOOK AT THE SUFFIXING PREFERENCE
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
ASYMMETRIES IN THE PROSODIC PHRASING OF FUNCTION WORDS: ANOTHER LOOK AT THE SUFFIXING PREFERENCE
2014
Overview
It is a well-known fact that across the world's languages there is a fairly strong asymmetry in the affixation of grammatical material, in that suffixes considerably outnumber prefixes in typological databases. This article argues that prosody, specifically prosodie phrasing, plays an important part in bringing about this asymmetry. Prosodie word and phrase boundaries may occur after a clitic function word preceding its lexical host with sufficient frequency so as to impede the fusion required for affixhood. Conversely, prosodie boundaries rarely, if ever, occur between a lexical host and a clitic function word following it. Hence, prosody does not impede the fusion process between lexical hosts and postposed function words, which therefore become affixes more easily. Evidence for the asymmetry in prosodie phrasing is provided from two sources: disfluencies, and ditropic cliticization, that is, the fact that grammatical PROclitics may be phonological ENclitics (i.e. phrased with a preceding host), but grammatical enclitics are never phonological proclitics. Earlier explanations for the suffixing preference have neglected prosody almost completely and thus also missed the related asymmetry in ditropic cliticization. More importantly, the evidence from prosodie phrasing suggests a new venue for explaining the suffixing preference. The asymmetry in prosodie phrasing, which, according to the hypothesis proposed here, is a major factor underlying the suffixing preference, has a natural basis in the mechanics of turn-taking as well as in the mechanics of speech production.
