Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons
by
FLEURBAEY, MARC
, VOORHOEVE, ALEX
in
Blindness
/ Distributive justice
/ Egalitarianism
/ Ethics
/ Individuals
/ Inequality
/ Interpersonal conflicts
/ Morality
/ Self interest
/ Studies
/ Trade-off
/ Utilitarianism
/ Visual impairment
2012
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons
by
FLEURBAEY, MARC
, VOORHOEVE, ALEX
in
Blindness
/ Distributive justice
/ Egalitarianism
/ Ethics
/ Individuals
/ Inequality
/ Interpersonal conflicts
/ Morality
/ Self interest
/ Studies
/ Trade-off
/ Utilitarianism
/ Visual impairment
2012
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons
2012
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The difference between the unity of the individual and the separateness of persons requires that there be a shift in the moral weight that we accord to changes in utility when we move from making intrapersonal trade-offs to making interpersonal trade-offs. We examine which forms of egalitarianism can, and which cannot, account for this shift. We argue that a form of egalitarianism which is concerned only with the extent of outcome inequality cannot account for this shift. We also argue that a view which is concerned with both outcome inequality and with the unfairness of inequality in individuals’ expected utilities can account for this shift. Finally, we limn an alternative view, on which such inequalities are not intrinsically bad, but nonetheless determine the strength of individuals’ competing claims. We argue that this ‘Competing Claims View’ can also account for the shift.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.