Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Beyond \Does it Pay to be Green?\ A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP—CFP Relationship
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Beyond \Does it Pay to be Green?\ A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP—CFP Relationship
Do you wish to request the book?
Beyond \Does it Pay to be Green?\ A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP—CFP Relationship
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Beyond \Does it Pay to be Green?\ A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP—CFP Relationship
2013
Overview
Review of extant research on the corporate environmental performance (CEP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) link generally demonstrates a positive relationship. However, some arguments and empirical results have demonstrated otherwise. As a result, researchers have called for a contingency approach to this research stream, which moves beyond the basic question \"does it pay to be green?\" and instead asks \"when does it pay to be green?\" In answering this call, we provide a meta-analytic review of CEP—CFP literature in which we identify potential moderators to the CEP—CFP relationship including environmental performance type (e.g., reactive vs. proactive performance), firm characteristics (e.g., large vs. small firms), and methodological issues (e.g., self-report measures). By analyzing these contingencies, this study attempts to provide a basis on which to draw conclusions regarding some inconsistencies and debates in the CEP—CFP research. Some of the results of the moderator analysis suggest that small firms benefit from environmental performance as much or more than large firms, US firms seem to benefit more than international counterparts, and environmental performance seems to have the strongest influence on market-measures of financial performance.
Publisher
Springer,Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
