Journal Article

Comparison of downsizing strategy (HANGZHOU Solution) and standard annulus sizing strategy in type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial

Guo, Yuchao, Jiang, Jubo, Hu, Po, Ren, Kaida, Zhu, Qifeng, Wang, Jian'an, Fan, Jiaqi, He, Yuxin, Ng, Stella, Li, Ranxi, Li, Huajun, Liu, Qiong, Liu, Xianbao, Wang, Lihan, Lin, Xinping

2024

Overview

There has not been a consensus on the prothesis sizing strategy in type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Modifications to standard annular sizing strategies might be required due to the distinct anatomical characteristics. We have devised a downsizing strategy for TAVR using a self-expanding valve specifically for patients with type 0 bicuspid AS. The primary aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of downsizing strategy with the Standard Annulus Sizing Strategy in TAVR for patients with type 0 bicuspid AS. It is a prospective, multi-center, superiority, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing the Down Sizing and Standard Annulus Sizing Strategy in patients with type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Eligible participants will include patients with severe type 0 bicuspid AS, as defined by criteria such as mean gradient across aortic valve ≥40 mmHg, peak aortic jet velocity ≥4.0 m/s, aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.0 cm², or AVA index ≤0.6 cm2/m2. These patients will be randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to either the Down Sizing Strategy group or the Standard Sizing Strategy group. In the Down Sizing Strategy group, a valve one size smaller will be implanted if the “waist sign” manifests along with less than mild regurgitation during balloon pre-dilatation. The primary end point of the study is a composite of VARC-3 defined device success, absence of both permanent pacemaker implantation due to high-degree atrioventricular block and new-onset complete left bundle branch block. This study will compare the safety and efficacy of Down Sizing Strategy with the Standard Annulus Sizing Strategy and provide valuable insights into the optimal approach for sizing in TAVR patients with type 0 bicuspid AS. We hypothesize that the Down Sizing Strategy will demonstrate superiority when compared to the Standard Annulus Sizing Strategy. (Down Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution) vs Standard Sizing Strategy TAVR in Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis (Type 0) (TAILOR-TAVR), NCT05511792).

• Publisher: Elsevier Inc,Elsevier Limited
• Subject: Annuli / Aorta / Aortic stenosis / Aortic valve / Aortic Valve - abnormalities / Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging / Aortic Valve - surgery / Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery / Balloon treatment / Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease - complications / Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease - surgery / Clinical trials / Downsizing / Effectiveness / Equivalence Trials as Topic / Female / Heart / Heart Valve Prosthesis / Heart valves / Humans / Ischemia / Male / Multicenter Studies as Topic / Pacemakers / Prospective Studies / Prostheses / Prosthesis Design / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Regurgitation / Single-Blind Method / Sizing / Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods