Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Iodine Staining With Distance Countdown Improving the Safety for Reduction of Adverse Events: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Iodine Staining With Distance Countdown Improving the Safety for Reduction of Adverse Events: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Do you wish to request the book?
Iodine Staining With Distance Countdown Improving the Safety for Reduction of Adverse Events: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Iodine Staining With Distance Countdown Improving the Safety for Reduction of Adverse Events: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2025
Overview
INTRODUCTION:Lugol chromoendoscopy (LCE) is valuable, cost-effective, and widely used in early esophageal cancer screening, yet it suffers from low compliance because of adverse events after LCE. In addition, the reflux of iodine during iodine staining in the upper esophagus brings the risk of bucking and aspiration. We introduced a new model called distance countdown (DC) aimed to reduce reflux during iodine staining in upper esophageal LCE.METHODS:In this randomized controlled trial, 204 patients were randomized into the DC and No-DC groups. The primary end point was the difference in the incidence of positive starch reagent reaction (iodine solution reflux) between the 2 groups. The secondary end points were the comparisons of the incidence of other adverse events after LCE between the 2 groups.RESULTS:The rate of iodine solution reflux was 1.0% in the DC group and 26.5% in the No-DC group (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the incidences of bucking between the 2 groups were 1.0% and 9.8% (P = 0.005). LCE satisfaction rates were 78.4% and 76.5% in the DC and No-DC groups (P = 0.363), respectively. Concerning symptoms after LCE, incidences of sore throat, pharyngeal discomfort or odor, bitter taste, and heartburn were also reduced in the DC group (all P < 0.05).DISCUSSION:Adding DC as an auxiliary effect during LCE would reduce the risk of iodine solution reflux, as well as other adverse events after LCE. Implementing this measure could be beneficial in improving the safety of LCE in early esophageal cancer screening.
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer,Wolters Kluwer Health Medical Research, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subject
/ Coloring Agents - adverse effects
/ Diabetes
/ Early Detection of Cancer - adverse effects
/ Early Detection of Cancer - methods
/ Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis
/ Esophagoscopy - adverse effects
/ Esophagus - diagnostic imaging
/ Female
/ Gastroesophageal Reflux - chemically induced
/ Gastroesophageal Reflux - epidemiology
/ Gastroesophageal Reflux - etiology
/ Gastroesophageal Reflux - prevention & control
/ Humans
/ Iodides - administration & dosage
/ Iodine
/ Male
/ Nausea
/ Pain
/ Patients
/ Software
