Journal Article

Measuring research impact in Australia’s medical research institutes: a scoping literature review of the objectives for and an assessment of the capabilities of research impact assessment frameworks

Reeves, Penny, Deeming, Simon, Nilsson, Michael, Searles, Andrew

2017

Overview

Background Realising the economic potential of research institutions, including medical research institutes, represents a policy imperative for many Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development nations. The assessment of research impact has consequently drawn increasing attention. Research impact assessment frameworks (RIAFs) provide a structure to assess research translation, but minimal research has examined whether alternative RIAFs realise the intended policy outcomes. This paper examines the objectives presented for RIAFs in light of economic imperatives to justify ongoing support for health and medical research investment, leverage productivity via commercialisation and outcome–efficiency gains in health systems, and ensure that translation and impact considerations are embedded into the research process. This paper sought to list the stated objectives for RIAFs, to identify existing frameworks and to evaluate whether the identified frameworks possessed the capabilities necessary to address the specified objectives. Methods A scoping review of the literature to identify objectives specified for RIAFs, inform upon descriptive criteria for each objective and identify existing RIAFs. Criteria were derived for each objective. The capability for the existing RIAFs to realise the alternative objectives was evaluated based upon these criteria. Results The collated objectives for RIAFs included accountability (top-down), transparency/accountability (bottom-up), advocacy, steering, value for money, management/learning and feedback/allocation, prospective orientation, and speed of translation. Of the 25 RIAFs identified, most satisfied objectives such as accountability and advocacy, which are largely sufficient for the first economic imperative to justify research investment. The frameworks primarily designed to optimise the speed of translation or enable the prospective orientation of research possessed qualities most likely to optimise the productive outcomes from research. However, the results show that few frameworks met the criteria for these objectives. Conclusion It is imperative that the objective(s) for an assessment framework are explicit and that RIAFs are designed to realise these objectives. If the objectives include the capability to pro-actively drive productive research impacts, the potential for prospective orientation and a focus upon the speed of translation merits prioritisation. Frameworks designed to optimise research translation and impact, rather than simply assess impact, offer greater promise to contribute to the economic imperatives compelling their implementation.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Academies and Institutes - economics / Academies and Institutes - statistics & numerical data / Accountability / Advocacy / Alternative approaches / Australia / Biomedical Research - economics / Biomedical Research - statistics & numerical data / Commercialization / Costs and Cost Analysis / Criteria / Economic development / Economic growth / Economic research / Economic structure / Economics / Efficiency / Evaluation / Expenditures / Feedback / Frame analysis / Funding / GDP / Government spending / Grey literature / Gross Domestic Product / Health Administration / Health care / Health care policy / Health Impact Assessment - economics / Health Impact Assessment - statistics & numerical data / Health Policy / Health services / Health Services Research / Institutes / International economic organizations / Investments / Knowledge / Library associations / Literary translation / Literature reviews / Medical libraries / Medical research / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Methods / Money / Objectives / Organizational Objectives / Possession / Prioritizing / Productivity / Public Health / R & D/Technology Policy / Research centers / Research facilities / Research institutions / Review / Science / Translation / Translational Research, Biomedical - economics / Translational Research, Biomedical - statistics & numerical data / Transparency