Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
![Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors](https://www.mbrl.ae/o/mbrl-theme/images/site-assets/generic/no-book-image.png)
Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors
by
Rencic, Joseph
, Durning, Steven
, Fagan, Mark
, Szauter, Karen
, Trowbridge, Robert L.
in
Clinical Clerkship - methods
/ Clinical Clerkship - standards
/ Clinical Decision-Making - methods
/ Core curriculum
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Diagnostic systems
/ Directors
/ Education
/ Female
/ Health care
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Internal Medicine - education
/ Internal Medicine - methods
/ Internal Medicine - standards
/ Male
/ Medical schools
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Original Research
/ Physician Executives
/ Problem Solving
/ Reasoning
/ Schools
/ Schools, Medical - standards
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ United States - epidemiology
2017
![Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!](https://www.mbrl.ae/o/mbrl-theme/images/site-assets/illustrations/modal-success.png)
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
![Oops! Something went wrong.](https://www.mbrl.ae/o/mbrl-theme/images/site-assets/illustrations/modal-fail.png)
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
![](https://www.mbrl.ae/o/mbrl-theme/images/site-assets/generic/no-book-image.png)
Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors
by
Rencic, Joseph
, Durning, Steven
, Fagan, Mark
, Szauter, Karen
, Trowbridge, Robert L.
in
Clinical Clerkship - methods
/ Clinical Clerkship - standards
/ Clinical Decision-Making - methods
/ Core curriculum
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Diagnostic systems
/ Directors
/ Education
/ Female
/ Health care
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Internal Medicine - education
/ Internal Medicine - methods
/ Internal Medicine - standards
/ Male
/ Medical schools
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Original Research
/ Physician Executives
/ Problem Solving
/ Reasoning
/ Schools
/ Schools, Medical - standards
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ United States - epidemiology
2017
![Oops! Something went wrong.](https://www.mbrl.ae/o/mbrl-theme/images/site-assets/illustrations/modal-fail.png)
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
![Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors](https://www.mbrl.ae/o/mbrl-theme/images/site-assets/generic/no-book-image.png)
Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors
by
Rencic, Joseph
, Durning, Steven
, Fagan, Mark
, Szauter, Karen
, Trowbridge, Robert L.
in
Clinical Clerkship - methods
/ Clinical Clerkship - standards
/ Clinical Decision-Making - methods
/ Core curriculum
/ Cross-Sectional Studies
/ Diagnostic systems
/ Directors
/ Education
/ Female
/ Health care
/ Humans
/ Internal Medicine
/ Internal Medicine - education
/ Internal Medicine - methods
/ Internal Medicine - standards
/ Male
/ Medical schools
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Original Research
/ Physician Executives
/ Problem Solving
/ Reasoning
/ Schools
/ Schools, Medical - standards
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ United States - epidemiology
2017
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
![We have requested the book for you!](https://www.mbrl.ae/o/mbrl-theme/images/site-assets/illustrations/modal-success.png)
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
![Oops! Something went wrong.](https://www.mbrl.ae/o/mbrl-theme/images/site-assets/illustrations/modal-fail.png)
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors
![Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors](https://syndetics.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0884-8734&client=MBRL&type=mbrl)
Journal Article
Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors
2017
Request now
and choose the collection method
Overview
Background
Recent reports, including the Institute of Medicine’s
Improving Diagnosis in Health Care
, highlight the pervasiveness and underappreciated harm of diagnostic error, and recommend enhancing health care professional education in diagnostic reasoning. However, little is known about clinical reasoning curricula at US medical schools.
Objective
To describe clinical reasoning curricula at US medical schools and to determine the attitudes of internal medicine clerkship directors toward teaching of clinical reasoning.
Design
Cross-sectional multicenter study.
Participants
US institutional members of the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM).
Main Measures
Examined responses to a survey that was emailed in May 2015 to CDIM institutional representatives, who reported on their medical school’s clinical reasoning curriculum.
Key Results
The response rate was 74% (91/123). Most respondents reported that a structured curriculum in clinical reasoning should be taught in all phases of medical education, including the preclinical years (64/85; 75%), clinical clerkships (76/87; 87%), and the fourth year (75/88; 85%), and that more curricular time should be devoted to the topic. Respondents indicated that most students enter the clerkship with only poor (25/85; 29%) to fair (47/85; 55%) knowledge of key clinical reasoning concepts. Most institutions (52/91; 57%) surveyed lacked sessions dedicated to these topics. Lack of curricular time (59/67, 88%) and faculty expertise in teaching these concepts (53/76, 69%) were identified as barriers.
Conclusions
Internal medicine clerkship directors believe that clinical reasoning should be taught throughout the 4 years of medical school, with the greatest emphasis in the clinical years. However, only a minority reported having teaching sessions devoted to clinical reasoning, citing a lack of curricular time and faculty expertise as the largest barriers. Our findings suggest that additional institutional and national resources should be dedicated to developing clinical reasoning curricula to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce diagnostic error.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.