Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Symptom clusters using the Spitzer quality of life index in patients with brain metastases—a reanalysis comparing different statistical methods
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Symptom clusters using the Spitzer quality of life index in patients with brain metastases—a reanalysis comparing different statistical methods
Do you wish to request the book?
Symptom clusters using the Spitzer quality of life index in patients with brain metastases—a reanalysis comparing different statistical methods
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Symptom clusters using the Spitzer quality of life index in patients with brain metastases—a reanalysis comparing different statistical methods
2013
Overview
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the use of three different statistical methods influences the composition of symptom clusters derived from patients with brain metastases.
Materials and methods
The dataset previously compiled from 129 brain metastases patients who completed the Spitzer Quality of Life Index (SQLI) and an additional study-designed 17-item symptom questionnaire was employed in this study. Symptom clusters extracted using principal component analysis in our previous study were compared to clusters determined using hierarchical cluster analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Clusters were identified using the three statistical methods at baseline, and at 1, 2, and 3 months following whole brain radiotherapy.
Results
The number and composition of symptom clusters at each time point varied based on the statistical method employed, despite the use of an identical dataset. However, some domains consistently clustered together, such as activity and daily living from the SQLI items. Of the 17 additional symptoms, memory loss, confusion, and trouble concentrating were always present in the same cluster. Nausea and vomiting also occurred in conjunction regardless of the analytical method employed.
Conclusion
Symptom clusters vary with respect to occurrence, quantity, and composition based on the statistical method utilized to extract them. Further studies should be conducted to determine an ideal statistical method in order to select the optimal method to employ. The use of a single analytical method is essential for consistency and comparison purposes in future symptom cluster research.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
/ Aged
/ Amnesia
/ Brain
/ Brain Neoplasms - physiopathology
/ Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy
/ Cancer
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Indexes
/ Karnofsky Performance Status
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Methods
/ Nausea
/ Nursing
/ Oncology
/ Patients
/ Principal Component Analysis - methods
/ Principal components analysis
/ Syndrome
/ Vomiting
