Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool
Do you wish to request the book?
Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Consumer‐Led Codesign of an Effective Online Consumer and Community Involvement Audit Tool
2025
Overview
Introduction There is evidence that consumer and community involvement (CCI) improves the quality and outcomes of health research. However, there is currently limited support for organisations to plan, implement and evaluate CCI activity. We aimed to codesign an audit tool that will enable organisations, researchers, community members and funders to measure the extent and nature of CCI in their respective settings. The tool was based on the Western Australian Health Translation Network's CCI Handbook. Methods We offered optional online workshops to inform participants about the study (total n = 9). Following this, we obtained feedback on the appropriateness of the Handbook and audit tool (n = 11). Finally, using Qualtrics surveys, we assessed the quality and effectiveness of the tool in evaluating CCI with 10 researchers, 6 funders, and 1 community member (total n = 17) sourced from networks within Monash University and the Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science. Results Overall participants had a positive response to the audit tool and believed it had value in quantifying direct implementation of CCI in their workplaces. Gaps identified included the need to address health and research literacy of community members, culturally responsive approaches when working with community members from migrant backgrounds and an identified need for visual and digital resources. Conclusions Application of the tool enabled participants to identify their respective CCI strengths, weakness and opportunities for improving the meaningful involvement of community members and community in their research activities and to support equity in these processes. Patient or Public Contribution The public participated in workshops providing feedback on the general structure of the audit tool as well as testing it within their research projects.
