MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Results from a test‐and‐treat study for influenza among residents of homeless shelters in King County, WA: A stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized trial
Results from a test‐and‐treat study for influenza among residents of homeless shelters in King County, WA: A stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Results from a test‐and‐treat study for influenza among residents of homeless shelters in King County, WA: A stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized trial
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Results from a test‐and‐treat study for influenza among residents of homeless shelters in King County, WA: A stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized trial
Results from a test‐and‐treat study for influenza among residents of homeless shelters in King County, WA: A stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized trial

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Results from a test‐and‐treat study for influenza among residents of homeless shelters in King County, WA: A stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized trial
Results from a test‐and‐treat study for influenza among residents of homeless shelters in King County, WA: A stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized trial
Journal Article

Results from a test‐and‐treat study for influenza among residents of homeless shelters in King County, WA: A stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized trial

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Persons experiencing homelessness face increased risk of influenza as overcrowding in congregate shelters can facilitate influenza virus spread. Data regarding on‐site influenza testing and antiviral treatment within homeless shelters remain limited. Methods We conducted a cluster‐randomized stepped‐wedge trial of point‐of‐care molecular influenza testing coupled with antiviral treatment with baloxavir or oseltamivir in residents of 14 homeless shelters in Seattle, WA, USA. Residents ≥3 months with cough or ≥2 acute respiratory illness (ARI) symptoms and onset <7 days were eligible. In control periods, mid‐nasal swabs were tested for influenza by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR). The intervention period included on‐site rapid molecular influenza testing and antiviral treatment for influenza‐positives if symptom onset was <48 h. The primary endpoint was monthly influenza virus infections in the control versus intervention periods. Influenza whole genome sequencing was performed to assess transmission and antiviral resistance. Results During 11/15/2019–4/30/2020 and 11/2/2020–4/30/2021, 1283 ARI encounters from 668 participants were observed. Influenza virus was detected in 51 (4%) specimens using RT‐PCR (A = 14; B = 37); 21 influenza virus infections were detected from 269 (8%) intervention‐eligible encounters by rapid molecular testing and received antiviral treatment. Thirty‐seven percent of ARI‐participant encounters reported symptom onset < 48 h. The intervention had no effect on influenza virus transmission (adjusted relative risk 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50–6.00). Of 23 influenza genomes, 86% of A(H1N1)pdm09 and 81% of B/Victoria sequences were closely related. Conclusion Our findings suggest feasibility of influenza test‐and‐treat strategies in shelters. Additional studies would help discern an intervention effect during periods of increased influenza activity.