Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Long-term effects of bipolar electrocoagulation and suture hemostasis on the ovarian reserve following endometriotic cystectomy: a meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Long-term effects of bipolar electrocoagulation and suture hemostasis on the ovarian reserve following endometriotic cystectomy: a meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Long-term effects of bipolar electrocoagulation and suture hemostasis on the ovarian reserve following endometriotic cystectomy: a meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Long-term effects of bipolar electrocoagulation and suture hemostasis on the ovarian reserve following endometriotic cystectomy: a meta-analysis
2025
Overview
Objective
The long-term impact of electrocoagulation and suture hemostasis on ovarian reserve (OR) after endometriotic cystectomy remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term and long-term effects of coagulation and suture hemostasis on ovarian reserve based on the postoperative levels of the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH).
Methods
PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and other databases were searched for eligible studies published up to May 2023.The quality assessment of the RCTs was performed as indicated by the Cochrane Collaboration tool in the Cochrane Handbook. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the non-RCTs. The random-effects or fixed-effects model was used to quantify the weighted mean difference (WMD) at the 95% confidence interval (CI) in the treatment effect across the different studies.
Results
Six randomized controlled trials and two prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the AMH levels between the electrocoagulation and the suture group at 1 month (WMD: −0.52, 95%CI (−1.02, −0.01),
P
= 0.04), 3 months (WMD: −0.72, 95%CI (−1.13, −0.31),
P
= 0.0005), 6 months (WMD: −0.80, 95%CI (−1.22, −0.38),
P
= 0.0002) and 12 months (WMD: −0.81, 95%CI (−1.24, −0.37),
P
= 0.0003), postoperatively. The mean difference of AMH in electrocoagulation group at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery was −1.75; −1.37; −1.10; −0.92 respectively; meanwhile, in the suture group were −2.50; −2.46; −2.33; −2.24, respectively.
Conclusion
Compared with electrocoagulation, suture hemostasis has less impact on OR. Although the OR of two groups gradually recovered, electrocoagulation still caused more damage to AMH than suture at 12 months after surgery. Suturing could be a better choice after stripping ovarian endometriomas.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
Anti-Mullerian Hormone - blood
/ Electrocoagulation - adverse effects
/ Electrocoagulation - methods
/ Female
/ Hemostasis, Surgical - adverse effects
/ Hemostasis, Surgical - methods
/ Humans
/ Medicine
/ Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
/ Ovarian Reserve - physiology
/ Ovaries
