Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Extent of Resection and Long-Term Outcomes for Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: a SEER Database Analysis of Mucinous and non-Mucinous Histologies
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Extent of Resection and Long-Term Outcomes for Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: a SEER Database Analysis of Mucinous and non-Mucinous Histologies
Do you wish to request the book?
Extent of Resection and Long-Term Outcomes for Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: a SEER Database Analysis of Mucinous and non-Mucinous Histologies
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Extent of Resection and Long-Term Outcomes for Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: a SEER Database Analysis of Mucinous and non-Mucinous Histologies
2024
Overview
Background
Mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas (MAA) and non-mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas (NMAA) demonstrate differences in rates and patterns of recurrence, which may inform the appropriate extent of surgical resection (i.e., appendectomy versus colectomy). The impact of extent of resection on disease-specific survival (DSS) for each histologic subtype was assessed.
Patients and Methods
Patients with resected, non-metastatic MAA and NMAA were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2020). Multivariable models were created to examine predictors of colectomy for each histologic subtype. DSS was calculated using Kaplan–Meier estimates and examined using Cox proportional hazards modeling.
Results
Among 4674 patients (MAA:
n
= 1990, 42.6%; NMAA:
n
= 2684, 57.4%), the majority (67.8%) underwent colectomy. Among colectomy patients, the rate of nodal positivity increased with higher T-stage (MAA: T1: 4.6%, T2: 4.0%, T3: 17.1%, T4: 21.6%,
p
< 0.001; NMAA: T1: 6.8%, T2: 11.4%, T3: 25.6%, T4: 43.8%,
p
< 0.001) and higher tumor grade (MAA: well differentiated: 7.7%, moderately differentiated: 19.2%, and poorly differentiated: 31.3%; NMAA: well differentiated: 9.0%, moderately differentiated: 20.5%, and 44.4%;
p
< 0.001). Nodal positivity was more frequently observed in NMAA (27.6% versus 16.4%,
p
< 0.001). Utilization of colectomy was associated with improved DSS for NMAA patients with T2 (log rank
p
= 0.095) and T3 (log rank
p
= 0.018) tumors as well as moderately differentiated histology (log rank
p
= 0.006). Utilization of colectomy was not associated with improved DSS for MAA patients, which was confirmed in a multivariable model for T-stage, grade, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–1.22].
Conclusions
Colectomy was associated with improved DSS for patients with NMAA but not MAA. Colectomy for MAA may not be required.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
/ Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - mortality
/ Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - pathology
/ Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - surgery
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Appendiceal Neoplasms - mortality
/ Appendiceal Neoplasms - pathology
/ Appendiceal Neoplasms - surgery
/ Appendix
/ Cancer
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology
/ Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery
/ Oncology
/ Surgery
