Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Understanding long‐term effects of topsoil removal in peatlands: overcoming thresholds for fen meadows restoration
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Understanding long‐term effects of topsoil removal in peatlands: overcoming thresholds for fen meadows restoration
Do you wish to request the book?
Understanding long‐term effects of topsoil removal in peatlands: overcoming thresholds for fen meadows restoration
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Understanding long‐term effects of topsoil removal in peatlands: overcoming thresholds for fen meadows restoration
2015
Overview
QUESTIONS: What are the long‐term results of fen meadow restoration after topsoil removal on peatlands? What are the causes of slow fen‐meadow vegetation recovery on peat soils after topsoil removal? LOCATION: Drentsche Aa Nature Reserve (53°00′49″N, 6°37′46″E) in the northeast Netherlands, with extensive natural and partially restored fen meadows (ca. 10,000 ha). METHODS: Restoration measures consisted of removal of acidified and fertilized topsoil and improvement of local hydrology by blocking or removing drainage ditches. The effects of shallow (20 cm) and deep (40 cm) topsoil removal were compared. We monitored vegetation changes after restoration measures in permanent plots over a 13‐yr period, and analysed changes in species composition over time with ordination techniques (multivariate analysis: PCA and RDA). Soil conditions over time were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: The vegetation and environment shifted over time in response to restoration. At first the vegetation stagnated in a species‐poor phase for 5 yr, but eventually fen‐meadow species re‐established. At the end of the observation period, after 14 yr, the vegetation after both shallow and deep peat removal was similar. Soil acidification occurred immediately after topsoil removal (within the first 2–3 yr) due to pyrite oxidation when the soil was exposed to air after site excavation and the peat was temporarily desiccated. CONCLUSIONS: We found poor re‐establishment of fen‐meadow vegetation and persistence of species‐poor communities during the first 5 yr after topsoil removal, probably resulting from internal soil acidification. After further rewetting, a rapid shift towards the target community composition was observed. The positive shift in development of fen‐meadow vegetation probably occurred due to increased groundwater discharge after successful hydrological measures were applied. Appropriate hydrological conditions (strong discharge of groundwater) are important for the success of restoration of these fen meadows, especially if pyrite is present in shallow soil layers.
