Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Bullectomy and Partial Pleurectomy versus Chest Tube Drainage for Treatment of Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax—A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Bullectomy and Partial Pleurectomy versus Chest Tube Drainage for Treatment of Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax—A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Bullectomy and Partial Pleurectomy versus Chest Tube Drainage for Treatment of Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax—A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Bullectomy and Partial Pleurectomy versus Chest Tube Drainage for Treatment of Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax—A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis
2022
Overview
Background and objective: Current guidelines recommend chest tube (CT) drainage as the initial treatment of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP). Surgery should be considered in cases of persistent air leak or recurrent disease. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is nowadays an established surgical treatment for complicated spontaneous pneumothorax. However, reports on VATS-bullectomy with partial pleurectomy (VBPP) for treatment of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) are limited. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of patients with secondary pneumothorax treated either by VBPP or CT drainage in our institution. Secondly, we assessed underlying clinical parameters to identify potential risk factors for SSP recurrence. Materials and Methods: Eighty-two patients were included in this study. Long-term recurrence rates and potential risk factors for SSP recurrence were analyzed. Results: Thirty-six patients (43.9%) underwent VBPP, whereas 46 (56.1%) patients subsequently underwent CT treatment. During a median follow-up period of 76.5 months, VBPP patients experienced a significantly low recurrence rate compared to CT patients (VBPP vs. CT: 16.7% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.016). However, VBPP was associated with a higher complication rate and significantly longer length of hospital stay (LOS). Male sex (male vs. female: p = 0.021) and CT treatment (VBPP vs. CT: p < 0.001) were identified as potential risk factors for SSP recurrence. Conclusions: VBPP is a suitable surgical treatment for SSP. However, prolonged LOS and possible complications should be discussed prior to VBPP.
