Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparative Economic Analysis of Solar PV and Reused EV Batteries in the Residential Sector of Three Emerging Countries—The Philippines, Indonesia, and Vietnam
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparative Economic Analysis of Solar PV and Reused EV Batteries in the Residential Sector of Three Emerging Countries—The Philippines, Indonesia, and Vietnam
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparative Economic Analysis of Solar PV and Reused EV Batteries in the Residential Sector of Three Emerging Countries—The Philippines, Indonesia, and Vietnam
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparative Economic Analysis of Solar PV and Reused EV Batteries in the Residential Sector of Three Emerging Countries—The Philippines, Indonesia, and Vietnam
2023
Overview
An emerging problem associated with the increased global demand for electric vehicles (EVs) is the post-use of lithium-ion batteries installed in them. Discarded batteries maintain 70–80% of their performance; thus, they are highly valuable recycling resources. Accordingly, technologies that complement the intermittency of renewable energy by integrating discarded EV batteries into battery energy storage systems (BESSs) are receiving attention. Here, the economic feasibility of a residential solar photovoltaic (PV) + reused BESS (RBESS) integrated system in three emerging countries (Philippines, Indonesia, and Vietnam) was analyzed by comparing its performance with that of diesel power generation and central grid-supplied power. The proposed system had a higher economic feasibility than diesel power generation (55.9% lower LCOE) but a lower economic feasibility than the central grid-supplied power (282.7% higher LCOE) in all three countries. Additionally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by incorporating the investment cost, government subsidy, and social cost of greenhouse gas emissions. In conclusion, the Philippines is the best country for grid parity with the integrated system, following Indonesia and Vietnam. This study examined both the economic and social benefits of the proposed system as a countermeasure to climate change and the virtuous resource cycle.
Publisher
MDPI AG
