Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
How Happy Are Equine Athletes? Stakeholder Perceptions of Equine Welfare Issues Associated with Equestrian Sport
by
Horseman, Sue
, Pollard, Danica
, Wathan, Jennifer
, Pinchbeck, Gina
, Furtado, Tamzin
, Hall, Carol
, Douglas, Janet
, Preshaw, Liane
, Hockenhull, Jo
, Smith, Rebecca
, Rogers, Jan
in
animal welfare
/ competition
/ equestrian sport
/ equine
/ Ethics
/ Focus groups
/ horse
/ Horses
/ Perceptions
/ physical health
/ quality of life
/ riding
/ sports
/ stakeholders
/ welfare
/ welfare assessment
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
How Happy Are Equine Athletes? Stakeholder Perceptions of Equine Welfare Issues Associated with Equestrian Sport
by
Horseman, Sue
, Pollard, Danica
, Wathan, Jennifer
, Pinchbeck, Gina
, Furtado, Tamzin
, Hall, Carol
, Douglas, Janet
, Preshaw, Liane
, Hockenhull, Jo
, Smith, Rebecca
, Rogers, Jan
in
animal welfare
/ competition
/ equestrian sport
/ equine
/ Ethics
/ Focus groups
/ horse
/ Horses
/ Perceptions
/ physical health
/ quality of life
/ riding
/ sports
/ stakeholders
/ welfare
/ welfare assessment
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
How Happy Are Equine Athletes? Stakeholder Perceptions of Equine Welfare Issues Associated with Equestrian Sport
by
Horseman, Sue
, Pollard, Danica
, Wathan, Jennifer
, Pinchbeck, Gina
, Furtado, Tamzin
, Hall, Carol
, Douglas, Janet
, Preshaw, Liane
, Hockenhull, Jo
, Smith, Rebecca
, Rogers, Jan
in
animal welfare
/ competition
/ equestrian sport
/ equine
/ Ethics
/ Focus groups
/ horse
/ Horses
/ Perceptions
/ physical health
/ quality of life
/ riding
/ sports
/ stakeholders
/ welfare
/ welfare assessment
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
How Happy Are Equine Athletes? Stakeholder Perceptions of Equine Welfare Issues Associated with Equestrian Sport
Journal Article
How Happy Are Equine Athletes? Stakeholder Perceptions of Equine Welfare Issues Associated with Equestrian Sport
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The international governing body for equestrian sports, the Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI), states that the welfare of the horse must be paramount and never subordinated to competitive or commercial influences. However, there is growing unease about welfare issues from both within and outside the sport. The aim of this study was to understand stakeholder perceptions of current welfare issues within equestrian sport, determine whether there is scope for change, and explore attitudes towards welfare assessment. Participants (n = 48) from equestrian sport (n = 38) and animal welfare research (n = 10) attended a workshop that included welfare-related presentations and focus group sessions. The focus group sessions were recorded, anonymised and analysed using thematic analysis. Conflict between the demands of competition and the needs of the horse was identified as a key welfare challenge. Although the physical health of equine athletes is closely monitored, horses’ psychological needs are sometimes overlooked. Participants recognised that improving competition practices may not be as impactful as improving the general management and training of horses. The term “quality of life” was considered preferable to “welfare”, which had negative connotations. Participants appreciated the idea of incorporating formal welfare assessments into their training and competition plans but stated that existing tools are rarely used and are not deemed feasible for real-life conditions.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.