Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
by
Flannelly, Grainne
, Martin, Cara
, Fitzpatrick, Patricia
, O'Connor, Mairead
, O'Donovan, Bernadine
, O'Leary, John
, Doherty, Lorraine
, Mooney, Therese
, Rimmer, Ben
, Sharp, Linda
in
Age groups
/ Aged
/ Attitudes
/ Automatic processes
/ barriers
/ Behavior
/ Behavior change
/ Behavior modification
/ Cancer
/ cancer risk
/ Cellular biology
/ Cervical cancer
/ Cervix
/ Cognitive ability
/ COM‐B model
/ Consent
/ Coping
/ Coping strategies
/ Domains
/ Early Detection of Cancer
/ Education
/ Environmental aspects
/ Ethnicity
/ Female
/ Foreign aid
/ Health care
/ Health services
/ Human papillomavirus
/ Humans
/ Interviews
/ Mass Screening
/ Medical personnel
/ Medical screening
/ Motivation
/ Older people
/ Older women
/ Original
/ Participation
/ Patient participation
/ Patients
/ Qualitative Research
/ Recruitment
/ Research projects
/ Risk perception
/ screening coverage
/ Social interactions
/ Social support
/ Teams
/ Tests
/ Theoretical Domains Framework
/ Uptake
/ Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
/ Women
/ Womens health
/ Young women
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
by
Flannelly, Grainne
, Martin, Cara
, Fitzpatrick, Patricia
, O'Connor, Mairead
, O'Donovan, Bernadine
, O'Leary, John
, Doherty, Lorraine
, Mooney, Therese
, Rimmer, Ben
, Sharp, Linda
in
Age groups
/ Aged
/ Attitudes
/ Automatic processes
/ barriers
/ Behavior
/ Behavior change
/ Behavior modification
/ Cancer
/ cancer risk
/ Cellular biology
/ Cervical cancer
/ Cervix
/ Cognitive ability
/ COM‐B model
/ Consent
/ Coping
/ Coping strategies
/ Domains
/ Early Detection of Cancer
/ Education
/ Environmental aspects
/ Ethnicity
/ Female
/ Foreign aid
/ Health care
/ Health services
/ Human papillomavirus
/ Humans
/ Interviews
/ Mass Screening
/ Medical personnel
/ Medical screening
/ Motivation
/ Older people
/ Older women
/ Original
/ Participation
/ Patient participation
/ Patients
/ Qualitative Research
/ Recruitment
/ Research projects
/ Risk perception
/ screening coverage
/ Social interactions
/ Social support
/ Teams
/ Tests
/ Theoretical Domains Framework
/ Uptake
/ Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
/ Women
/ Womens health
/ Young women
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
by
Flannelly, Grainne
, Martin, Cara
, Fitzpatrick, Patricia
, O'Connor, Mairead
, O'Donovan, Bernadine
, O'Leary, John
, Doherty, Lorraine
, Mooney, Therese
, Rimmer, Ben
, Sharp, Linda
in
Age groups
/ Aged
/ Attitudes
/ Automatic processes
/ barriers
/ Behavior
/ Behavior change
/ Behavior modification
/ Cancer
/ cancer risk
/ Cellular biology
/ Cervical cancer
/ Cervix
/ Cognitive ability
/ COM‐B model
/ Consent
/ Coping
/ Coping strategies
/ Domains
/ Early Detection of Cancer
/ Education
/ Environmental aspects
/ Ethnicity
/ Female
/ Foreign aid
/ Health care
/ Health services
/ Human papillomavirus
/ Humans
/ Interviews
/ Mass Screening
/ Medical personnel
/ Medical screening
/ Motivation
/ Older people
/ Older women
/ Original
/ Participation
/ Patient participation
/ Patients
/ Qualitative Research
/ Recruitment
/ Research projects
/ Risk perception
/ screening coverage
/ Social interactions
/ Social support
/ Teams
/ Tests
/ Theoretical Domains Framework
/ Uptake
/ Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
/ Women
/ Womens health
/ Young women
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
Journal Article
Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)‐participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM‐B model
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Effective screening can prevent cervical cancer, but many women choose not to attend their screening tests. Objective This study aimed to investigate behavioural influences on cervical screening participation using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM‐B models of behaviour change. Design A qualitative study and semistructured phone interviews were conducted with women invited for routine screening tests within the national cervical screening programme in Ireland. Setting and Participants Forty‐eight women aged 25–65 years were recruited from the national screening register. Results Seven core themes were identified that mapped to three COM‐B components and 11 TDF domains: (1) knowledge of cervical cancer and screening, (2) coping with smear tests, (3) competing motivational processes—automatic and reflective, (4) cognitive resources, (5) role of social support, (6) environmental influences and (7) perceputal and practical influences. A range of knowledge about screening, perceived risk of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus infection was evident. Factors that influenced screening behaviours may be hierarchical—some were assigned greater importance than others. Positive screening behaviours were linked to autonomous motivation. Deficits in physical and psychological capability (inadequate coping skills) were barriers to screening, while physical and social opportunity (e.g. healthcare professional ‘champions’) could facilitate participation. Older women raised age‐related issues (e.g. screening no longer necessary) and had more negative attitudes to screening, while younger women identified practical barriers. Conclusions This study provides insight into screening participation and will aid development of theoretically informed interventions to increase uptake. Patient or Public Contribution Women invited for screening tests through the national screening programme were interviewed. A Public & Patient Involvement (PPI) Panel, established to provide input into all CERVIVA research projects, advised the research team on recruitment materials and were given the opportunity to review and comment on the interview topic guide. This panel is made up of six women with various cervical screening histories and experiences.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.