Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients
by
Herd, Clare
, Duda, Joan
, Gkoutos, Georgios
, Mehanna, Hisham
, Wolstenholme, Jane
, Matheson, Lauren
, Nankivell, Paul
, Winter, Stuart
, Calvert, Melanie
, Moore, David J.
, Main, Barry
, Watson, Eila
, Wong, Wai Lup
, Brett, Jo
, Lorenc, Ava
, Gaunt, Piers
, Mittal, Saloni
, Dretzke, Janine
, Cherrill, Louise‐Rae
, Firth, Charlotte
, Kiely, Philip
, Chernbumroong, Saisakul
, Karwath, Andreas
, Gaunt, Claire
, Greaves, Colin
, Adriano, Ada
, Thomas, Steve
, Ozakinci, Gozde
in
attitude
/ Attitude of Health Personnel
/ Breast
/ Breast cancer
/ Breast Neoplasms - psychology
/ Breast Neoplasms - therapy
/ cancer
/ Clinical Trials
/ Data collection
/ Endometrial cancer
/ Endometrial Neoplasms - psychology
/ Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy
/ Endometrium
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Follow-Up Studies
/ Health care
/ Health Personnel - psychology
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Mammography
/ Medical personnel
/ Meta‐analysis
/ Mixed methods research
/ Neoplasms - psychology
/ Neoplasms - therapy
/ Patient satisfaction
/ patient‐initiated follow‐up
/ Prognostic Factor
/ Qualitative Research
/ Questionnaires
/ Software
/ survey
/ Surveys
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ Systematic review
/ Womens health
2023
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients
by
Herd, Clare
, Duda, Joan
, Gkoutos, Georgios
, Mehanna, Hisham
, Wolstenholme, Jane
, Matheson, Lauren
, Nankivell, Paul
, Winter, Stuart
, Calvert, Melanie
, Moore, David J.
, Main, Barry
, Watson, Eila
, Wong, Wai Lup
, Brett, Jo
, Lorenc, Ava
, Gaunt, Piers
, Mittal, Saloni
, Dretzke, Janine
, Cherrill, Louise‐Rae
, Firth, Charlotte
, Kiely, Philip
, Chernbumroong, Saisakul
, Karwath, Andreas
, Gaunt, Claire
, Greaves, Colin
, Adriano, Ada
, Thomas, Steve
, Ozakinci, Gozde
in
attitude
/ Attitude of Health Personnel
/ Breast
/ Breast cancer
/ Breast Neoplasms - psychology
/ Breast Neoplasms - therapy
/ cancer
/ Clinical Trials
/ Data collection
/ Endometrial cancer
/ Endometrial Neoplasms - psychology
/ Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy
/ Endometrium
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Follow-Up Studies
/ Health care
/ Health Personnel - psychology
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Mammography
/ Medical personnel
/ Meta‐analysis
/ Mixed methods research
/ Neoplasms - psychology
/ Neoplasms - therapy
/ Patient satisfaction
/ patient‐initiated follow‐up
/ Prognostic Factor
/ Qualitative Research
/ Questionnaires
/ Software
/ survey
/ Surveys
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ Systematic review
/ Womens health
2023
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients
by
Herd, Clare
, Duda, Joan
, Gkoutos, Georgios
, Mehanna, Hisham
, Wolstenholme, Jane
, Matheson, Lauren
, Nankivell, Paul
, Winter, Stuart
, Calvert, Melanie
, Moore, David J.
, Main, Barry
, Watson, Eila
, Wong, Wai Lup
, Brett, Jo
, Lorenc, Ava
, Gaunt, Piers
, Mittal, Saloni
, Dretzke, Janine
, Cherrill, Louise‐Rae
, Firth, Charlotte
, Kiely, Philip
, Chernbumroong, Saisakul
, Karwath, Andreas
, Gaunt, Claire
, Greaves, Colin
, Adriano, Ada
, Thomas, Steve
, Ozakinci, Gozde
in
attitude
/ Attitude of Health Personnel
/ Breast
/ Breast cancer
/ Breast Neoplasms - psychology
/ Breast Neoplasms - therapy
/ cancer
/ Clinical Trials
/ Data collection
/ Endometrial cancer
/ Endometrial Neoplasms - psychology
/ Endometrial Neoplasms - therapy
/ Endometrium
/ Epidemiology
/ Female
/ Follow-Up Studies
/ Health care
/ Health Personnel - psychology
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Mammography
/ Medical personnel
/ Meta‐analysis
/ Mixed methods research
/ Neoplasms - psychology
/ Neoplasms - therapy
/ Patient satisfaction
/ patient‐initiated follow‐up
/ Prognostic Factor
/ Qualitative Research
/ Questionnaires
/ Software
/ survey
/ Surveys
/ Surveys and Questionnaires
/ Systematic review
/ Womens health
2023
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients
Journal Article
Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients
2023
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
Current follow‐up models in cancer are seen to be unsustainable and inflexible, and there is growing interest in alternative models, such as patient‐initiated follow‐up (PIFU). It is therefore important to understand whether PIFU is acceptable to patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs).
Methods
Standard systematic review methodology aimed at limiting bias was used for study identification (to January 2022), selection and data extraction. Thematic synthesis was undertaken for qualitative data, and survey findings were tabulated and described.
Results
Nine qualitative studies and 22 surveys were included, mainly in breast and endometrial cancer. Women treated for breast or endometrial cancer and HCPs were mostly supportive of PIFU. Facilitators for PIFU included convenience, control over own health and avoidance of anxiety‐inducing clinic appointments. Barriers included loss of reassurance from scheduled visits and lack of confidence in self‐management. HCPs were supportive of PIFU but concerned about resistance to change, unsuitability of PIFU for some patients and costs.
Conclusion
PIFU is viewed mostly positively by women treated for breast or endometrial cancer, and by HCPs, but further evidence is needed from a wider range of cancers, men, and more representative samples.
A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020181412).
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc,Wiley
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.