Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Gaps in the Engagement of People With Lived and Living Experience and Caregivers in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Qualitative Study of Untapped Potential
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Gaps in the Engagement of People With Lived and Living Experience and Caregivers in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Qualitative Study of Untapped Potential
Do you wish to request the book?
Gaps in the Engagement of People With Lived and Living Experience and Caregivers in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Qualitative Study of Untapped Potential
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Gaps in the Engagement of People With Lived and Living Experience and Caregivers in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Qualitative Study of Untapped Potential
2025
Overview
Background People with lived/living experience and family/caregivers (PLLEX‐C) can be engaged in mental health and substance use health research in roles such as advisors, collaborators, and co‐researchers. While there is a substantial body of research describing the barriers and facilitators to effective lived experience engagement, the actual contributions that PLLEX‐C are making to the research remains under‐explored. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore new areas where PLLEX‐C can contribute to the research process. We wanted to understand gaps in the contributions of PLLEX‐C and how we can provide opportunities to grow and enhance their contributions to the research in which they are engaged. Methods A Canada‐wide sample of 28 PLLEX‐C took part in one of five focus groups, while 12 researchers from across Canada took part in individual interviews using a co‐designed semi‐structured interview guide. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using codebook thematic analysis. We engaged PLLEX‐C throughout the course of the study. Results Gaps in the engagement of PLLEX‐C were found across the research lifecycle. This included key aspects of project initiation, like establishing research questions and priorities, contributing to grant applications, and contributing to ethics processes. Gaps were also encountered in the research operations process, in terms of recruitment processes and data analysis. Lastly, gaps at the end‐of‐grant knowledge translation stage included manuscript co‐authorship and co‐presentation at conferences or other events. Conclusions PLLEX‐C are willing to be engaged in research across the research lifecycle, but many have experienced areas of untapped potential. To develop appropriate engagement plans for a given project, it is important to have open discussions with the PLLEX‐C engaged to understand their areas of skill, interest, and professional development goals, as well as barriers to full engagement in some stages of the project. This will make it possible to co‐design a creative and flexible personalized engagement plan that is meaningful to them and maximizes their engagement potential. This process will ensure that authentic engagement overrides tokenistic practices. Patient Engagement This study was conducted on lived/living experience engagement and the team includes people with lived/living experience. A lived/living experience working group contributed to the design and operation of the project, as well as to data analysis, interpretation, and co‐authorship.
