Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of viral encephalitis: sensitivity and clinical limitations
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of viral encephalitis: sensitivity and clinical limitations
Do you wish to request the book?
Next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of viral encephalitis: sensitivity and clinical limitations
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of viral encephalitis: sensitivity and clinical limitations
2020
Overview
Identification of pathogens causing viral encephalitis remains challenging, and in over 50% of cases the etiologic factor remains undetermined. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) based metagenomics has been successfully used to detect novel and rare infections, but its value for routine diagnosis of encephalitis remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine the sensitivity of shotgun metagenomic sequencing protocols, which include preamplification, and testing it against cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from encephalitis patients. For sensitivity testing HIV and HBV positive sera were serially diluted in CSF from an uninfected patient. NGS repeatedly detected HIV and HBV sequences present at concentrations from 10
5
to 10
2
and from 10
5
to 10 viral copies/reaction, respectively. However, when the same protocols were applied to RT-PCR/PCR positive CSF samples from 6 patients with enteroviral encephalitis (median viral load 47 copies/ml) and 15 patients with HSV, CMV or VZV encephalitis (median viral load 148 copies/ml), only 7 (28.6%) were identified as positive. In conclusions, while NGS has the advantage of being able to identify a wide range of potential pathogens it seems to be less sensitive compared to the standard amplification-based assays in the diagnosis of encephalitis, where low viral loads are common.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group
