MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi‐Digital, and Conventional
Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi‐Digital, and Conventional
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi‐Digital, and Conventional
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi‐Digital, and Conventional
Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi‐Digital, and Conventional

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi‐Digital, and Conventional
Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi‐Digital, and Conventional
Journal Article

Effect of Different Impression and Fabrication Techniques on the Precision of Custom Metal Posts: Fully Digital, Semi‐Digital, and Conventional

2026
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Objective This study evaluated the effect of different impression and fabrication techniques—conventional casting and 3D printing—on the precision of metal post‐and‐core restorations. Methods and Materials A maxillary central incisor was designed in ExoCAD, and STL files of the reference tooth and the “ideal” post were saved; the reference tooth was additively manufactured in metal. Four workflows were compared (n = 10/group): (1) conventional impression with a direct resin pattern and casting (CO); (2) semi‐digital impression with an intra‐canal Duralay pattern plus Silicone pick‐up, laboratory scan, and direct metal printing (DS); (3) semi‐digital Full Silicone (putty/wash) impression, laboratory scan, and direct metal printing (FS); and (4) fully digital intraoral scanning with Medit i700 and direct metal printing (FD). For each specimen, the fabricated post STL was compared to the “ideal post” STL in Geomagic Control X to assess precision. Normality was tested with Shapiro–Wilk, and between‐group comparisons used one‐way analysis of variance in SPSS (α = 0.05). Results In forty specimens (FD, DS, FS, CO; n = 10/group), three outcomes were analyzed: In‐Tol, Over‐Tol, and Under‐Tol. In‐Tol differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001); Tamhane's T2 indicated FD > DS, FS, CO (p = 0.006, < 0.001, < 0.001). Over‐Tol differed significantly (p < 0.001); FD < FS (p < 0.001), FD < CO (p = 0.021), and DS < FS (p < 0.001). Under‐Tol also differed significantly (p < 0.001); DS > FD (p = 0.027), DS > FS (p = 0.011), and CO > FS (p = 0.016). Conclusion Fully digital, directly printed Co–Cr posts exhibited superior precision compared with conventional and semi‐digital workflows. While conventional casting remains reliable, direct metal printing appears to be a practical and potentially easier alternative.