Journal Article

Natural language processing for automatic evaluation of free-text answers — a feasibility study based on the European Diploma in Radiology examination

Zufiría, Laura Oleaga, Müller, Lukas, Mildenberger, Peter, Kloeckner, Roman, Kämpgen, Benedikt, Junquero, Vanesa, Stoehr, Fabian, Merino, Cristina

2023

Overview

BackgroundWritten medical examinations consist of multiple-choice questions and/or free-text answers. The latter require manual evaluation and rating, which is time-consuming and potentially error-prone. We tested whether natural language processing (NLP) can be used to automatically analyze free-text answers to support the review process.MethodsThe European Board of Radiology of the European Society of Radiology provided representative datasets comprising sample questions, answer keys, participant answers, and reviewer markings from European Diploma in Radiology examinations. Three free-text questions with the highest number of corresponding answers were selected: Questions 1 and 2 were “unstructured” and required a typical free-text answer whereas question 3 was “structured” and offered a selection of predefined wordings/phrases for participants to use in their free-text answer. The NLP engine was designed using word lists, rule-based synonyms, and decision tree learning based on the answer keys and its performance tested against the gold standard of reviewer markings.ResultsAfter implementing the NLP approach in Python, F1 scores were calculated as a measure of NLP performance: 0.26 (unstructured question 1, n = 96), 0.33 (unstructured question 2, n = 327), and 0.5 (more structured question, n = 111). The respective precision/recall values were 0.26/0.27, 0.4/0.32, and 0.62/0.55.ConclusionThis study showed the successful design of an NLP-based approach for automatic evaluation of free-text answers in the EDiR examination. Thus, as a future field of application, NLP could work as a decision-support system for reviewers and support the design of examinations being adjusted to the requirements of an automated, NLP-based review process.Clinical relevance statementNatural language processing can be successfully used to automatically evaluate free-text answers, performing better with more structured question-answer formats. Furthermore, this study provides a baseline for further work applying, e.g., more elaborated NLP approaches/large language models.Key points• Free-text answers require manual evaluation, which is time-consuming and potentially error-prone.• We developed a simple NLP-based approach — requiring only minimal effort/modeling — to automatically analyze and mark free-text answers.• Our NLP engine has the potential to support the manual evaluation process.• NLP performance is better on a more structured question-answer format.

• Publisher: Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Decision support systems / Decision trees / Diplomas / Feasibility studies / Large language models / Multiple choice / Natural language processing / Performance evaluation / Physical examinations / Questions / Radiology