MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
The Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
The Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
The Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Journal Article

The Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sphingosine‐1‐Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Network Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
ABSTRACT Background Sphingosine‐1‐phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRM) are used to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Each drug has a different S1PR‐subtype selectivity. They target the G‐protein coupled S1P receptors and exert significant immunomodulatory effects, such as preventing the formation of new CNS lesions and the reactivation of pre‐existing lesions. Objective This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of S1PRM in treating MS. Methods A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted in August 2024. Randomized Controlled Trials that evaluated the efficacy of S1PRM in patients with MS were included. Changes in Annualized Relapse Rate and incidence of adverse effects were chosen as primary outcomes. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated. Confidence interval was kept at 95%. Individual interventions were compared using the Surface Under Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA). The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Results The search query resulted in a total of 1750 studies. After screening, 17 studies were included in the final analysis, with a population of 16,006. Fingolimod (1.25 mg) was significantly associated with a decreased ARR (SMD = −0.4422, 95% CI = [−0.5450 to −0.3394], p‐value < 0.0001, SUCRA = 92.65%). Whereas, ozanimod (1 mg) was associated with the lowest number of new Gadolinium‐enhanced lesions (SMD = −0.6516, 95% CI = [−0.8944 to −0.4087], p‐value < 0.0001, SUCRA = 86.38%). Siponimod (1.25 mg) was associated with the least number of adverse events (OR = 0.4606, 95% CI = [0.1893 to 1.1205], p = 0.0874, SUCRA = 93.20%). Almost all of the studies had a low risk of bias. Conclusion Fingolimod (1.25 mg) and ozanimod (1 mg) had the best efficacy, and siponimod (1.25 mg and 0.25 mg) had the best safety profile among the S1PRM. Further longitudinal studies should be conducted to assess the long‐term effects of these drugs on patient‐reported outcomes.