Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The accuracy of healthcare worker versus self collected (2-in-1) Oropharyngeal and Bilateral Mid-Turbinate (OPMT) swabs and saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2
by
Lee, Sing Ai
, Chan, Yiong Huak
, Tan, Cheryl Xiaotong
, Tan, Pei Ting
, Tey, Hong Liang
, Toh, Song Tar
, Tan, Seow Yen
, Lim, Ernest Tian Hong
, Siau, Chuin
, Koh, Gerald Choon Huat
, Tan, Thean Yen
in
Adult
/ Aged
/ Biology and Life Sciences
/ Bone
/ Coronaviruses
/ COVID-19
/ COVID-19 - diagnosis
/ COVID-19 - virology
/ COVID-19 Testing
/ Diagnostic systems
/ Epistaxis
/ Female
/ Health care
/ Health Personnel
/ Hospitals
/ Humans
/ Informed consent
/ Male
/ Medical personnel
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Middle Aged
/ Nasopharynx - virology
/ Nose
/ Occupational exposure
/ Oropharynx
/ Otolaryngology
/ Patients
/ People and Places
/ Personal protective equipment
/ Protective equipment
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Saliva
/ Saliva - virology
/ SARS-CoV-2 - genetics
/ SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification
/ Sensitivity
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Specimen Handling - methods
/ Supervision
/ Surgery
/ Turbinates - virology
/ Young Adult
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The accuracy of healthcare worker versus self collected (2-in-1) Oropharyngeal and Bilateral Mid-Turbinate (OPMT) swabs and saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2
by
Lee, Sing Ai
, Chan, Yiong Huak
, Tan, Cheryl Xiaotong
, Tan, Pei Ting
, Tey, Hong Liang
, Toh, Song Tar
, Tan, Seow Yen
, Lim, Ernest Tian Hong
, Siau, Chuin
, Koh, Gerald Choon Huat
, Tan, Thean Yen
in
Adult
/ Aged
/ Biology and Life Sciences
/ Bone
/ Coronaviruses
/ COVID-19
/ COVID-19 - diagnosis
/ COVID-19 - virology
/ COVID-19 Testing
/ Diagnostic systems
/ Epistaxis
/ Female
/ Health care
/ Health Personnel
/ Hospitals
/ Humans
/ Informed consent
/ Male
/ Medical personnel
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Middle Aged
/ Nasopharynx - virology
/ Nose
/ Occupational exposure
/ Oropharynx
/ Otolaryngology
/ Patients
/ People and Places
/ Personal protective equipment
/ Protective equipment
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Saliva
/ Saliva - virology
/ SARS-CoV-2 - genetics
/ SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification
/ Sensitivity
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Specimen Handling - methods
/ Supervision
/ Surgery
/ Turbinates - virology
/ Young Adult
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The accuracy of healthcare worker versus self collected (2-in-1) Oropharyngeal and Bilateral Mid-Turbinate (OPMT) swabs and saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2
by
Lee, Sing Ai
, Chan, Yiong Huak
, Tan, Cheryl Xiaotong
, Tan, Pei Ting
, Tey, Hong Liang
, Toh, Song Tar
, Tan, Seow Yen
, Lim, Ernest Tian Hong
, Siau, Chuin
, Koh, Gerald Choon Huat
, Tan, Thean Yen
in
Adult
/ Aged
/ Biology and Life Sciences
/ Bone
/ Coronaviruses
/ COVID-19
/ COVID-19 - diagnosis
/ COVID-19 - virology
/ COVID-19 Testing
/ Diagnostic systems
/ Epistaxis
/ Female
/ Health care
/ Health Personnel
/ Hospitals
/ Humans
/ Informed consent
/ Male
/ Medical personnel
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Middle Aged
/ Nasopharynx - virology
/ Nose
/ Occupational exposure
/ Oropharynx
/ Otolaryngology
/ Patients
/ People and Places
/ Personal protective equipment
/ Protective equipment
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Saliva
/ Saliva - virology
/ SARS-CoV-2 - genetics
/ SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification
/ Sensitivity
/ Sensitivity and Specificity
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Specimen Handling - methods
/ Supervision
/ Surgery
/ Turbinates - virology
/ Young Adult
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The accuracy of healthcare worker versus self collected (2-in-1) Oropharyngeal and Bilateral Mid-Turbinate (OPMT) swabs and saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2
Journal Article
The accuracy of healthcare worker versus self collected (2-in-1) Oropharyngeal and Bilateral Mid-Turbinate (OPMT) swabs and saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Self-sampling for SARS-CoV-2 would significantly raise testing capacity and reduce healthcare worker (HCW) exposure to infectious droplets personal, and protective equipment (PPE) use.
We conducted a diagnostic accuracy study where subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (n = 401) and healthy volunteers (n = 100) were asked to self-swab from their oropharynx and mid-turbinate (OPMT), and self-collect saliva. The results of these samples were compared to an OPMT performed by a HCW in the same patient at the same session.
In subjects confirmed to have COVID-19, the sensitivities of the HCW-swab, self-swab, saliva, and combined self-swab plus saliva samples were 82.8%, 75.1%, 74.3% and 86.5% respectively. All samples obtained from healthy volunteers were tested negative. Compared to HCW-swab, the sensitivities of a self-swab sample and saliva sample were inferior by 8.7% (95%CI: 2.4% to 15.0%, p = 0.006) and 9.5% (95%CI: 3.1% to 15.8%, p = 0.003) respectively. The combined detection rate of self-swab and saliva had a sensitivity of 2.7% (95%CI: -2.6% to 8.0%, p = 0.321). The sensitivity of both the self-collection methods are higher when the Ct value of the HCW swab is less than 30. The specificity of both the self-swab and saliva testing was 100% (95% CI 96.4% to 100%).
Our study provides evidence that sensitivities of self-collected OPMT swab and saliva samples were inferior to a HCW swab, but they could still be useful testing tools in the appropriate clinical settings.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
/ Aged
/ Bone
/ COVID-19
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Male
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Nose
/ Patients
/ Personal protective equipment
/ Research and Analysis Methods
/ Saliva
/ SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome
/ Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
/ Surgery
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.