Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
MWA Versus RFA for Perivascular and Peribiliary CRLM: A Retrospective Patient- and Lesion-Based Analysis of Two Historical Cohorts
by
Vroomen, Laurien G. P. H.
, van den Tol, Petrousjka M. P.
, van Tilborg, Aukje A. J. M.
, van Kuijk, Cornelis
, Meijerink, Martijn R.
, Scheffer, Hester J.
, de Jong, Marcus C.
, Nielsen, Karin
in
ABLATION
/ Ablation Techniques - methods
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ BILE
/ Bile Ducts - pathology
/ Bile Ducts - surgery
/ BILIARY TRACT
/ Cardiology
/ Catheter Ablation - methods
/ Clinical Investigation
/ Cohort Studies
/ Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
/ Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
/ Female
/ FLUORINE 18
/ Follow-Up Studies
/ Humans
/ Imaging
/ LIVER
/ Liver Neoplasms - secondary
/ Liver Neoplasms - surgery
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ METASTASES
/ MICROWAVE RADIATION
/ Microwaves - therapeutic use
/ Middle Aged
/ MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
/ NEOPLASMS
/ Nuclear Medicine
/ PATIENTS
/ POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
/ Radiology
/ RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
/ RADIOWAVE RADIATION
/ REGRESSION ANALYSIS
/ Retrospective Studies
/ SAFETY
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Ultrasound
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
MWA Versus RFA for Perivascular and Peribiliary CRLM: A Retrospective Patient- and Lesion-Based Analysis of Two Historical Cohorts
by
Vroomen, Laurien G. P. H.
, van den Tol, Petrousjka M. P.
, van Tilborg, Aukje A. J. M.
, van Kuijk, Cornelis
, Meijerink, Martijn R.
, Scheffer, Hester J.
, de Jong, Marcus C.
, Nielsen, Karin
in
ABLATION
/ Ablation Techniques - methods
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ BILE
/ Bile Ducts - pathology
/ Bile Ducts - surgery
/ BILIARY TRACT
/ Cardiology
/ Catheter Ablation - methods
/ Clinical Investigation
/ Cohort Studies
/ Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
/ Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
/ Female
/ FLUORINE 18
/ Follow-Up Studies
/ Humans
/ Imaging
/ LIVER
/ Liver Neoplasms - secondary
/ Liver Neoplasms - surgery
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ METASTASES
/ MICROWAVE RADIATION
/ Microwaves - therapeutic use
/ Middle Aged
/ MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
/ NEOPLASMS
/ Nuclear Medicine
/ PATIENTS
/ POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
/ Radiology
/ RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
/ RADIOWAVE RADIATION
/ REGRESSION ANALYSIS
/ Retrospective Studies
/ SAFETY
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Ultrasound
2016
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
MWA Versus RFA for Perivascular and Peribiliary CRLM: A Retrospective Patient- and Lesion-Based Analysis of Two Historical Cohorts
by
Vroomen, Laurien G. P. H.
, van den Tol, Petrousjka M. P.
, van Tilborg, Aukje A. J. M.
, van Kuijk, Cornelis
, Meijerink, Martijn R.
, Scheffer, Hester J.
, de Jong, Marcus C.
, Nielsen, Karin
in
ABLATION
/ Ablation Techniques - methods
/ Adult
/ Aged
/ Aged, 80 and over
/ BILE
/ Bile Ducts - pathology
/ Bile Ducts - surgery
/ BILIARY TRACT
/ Cardiology
/ Catheter Ablation - methods
/ Clinical Investigation
/ Cohort Studies
/ Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
/ Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
/ Female
/ FLUORINE 18
/ Follow-Up Studies
/ Humans
/ Imaging
/ LIVER
/ Liver Neoplasms - secondary
/ Liver Neoplasms - surgery
/ Male
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ METASTASES
/ MICROWAVE RADIATION
/ Microwaves - therapeutic use
/ Middle Aged
/ MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
/ NEOPLASMS
/ Nuclear Medicine
/ PATIENTS
/ POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
/ Radiology
/ RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
/ RADIOWAVE RADIATION
/ REGRESSION ANALYSIS
/ Retrospective Studies
/ SAFETY
/ Treatment Outcome
/ Ultrasound
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
MWA Versus RFA for Perivascular and Peribiliary CRLM: A Retrospective Patient- and Lesion-Based Analysis of Two Historical Cohorts
Journal Article
MWA Versus RFA for Perivascular and Peribiliary CRLM: A Retrospective Patient- and Lesion-Based Analysis of Two Historical Cohorts
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose
To retrospectively analyse the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in proximity to large vessels and/or major bile ducts.
Method and Materials
A database search was performed to include patients with unresectable histologically proven and/or
18
F–FDG–PET avid CRLM who were treated with RFA or MWA between January 2001 and September 2014 in a single centre. All lesions that were considered to have a peribiliary and/or perivascular location were included. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the distribution of patient, tumour and procedure characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression was used to correct for potential confounders.
Results
Two hundred and forty-three patients with 774 unresectable CRLM were ablated. One hundred and twenty-two patients (78 males; 44 females) had at least one perivascular or peribiliary lesion (
n
= 199). Primary efficacy rate of RFA was superior to MWA after 3 and 12 months of follow-up (
P
= 0.010 and
P
= 0.022); however, after multivariate analysis this difference was non-significant at 12 months (
P
= 0.078) and vanished after repeat ablations (
P
= 0.39). More CTCAE grade III complications occurred after MWA versus RFA (18.8 vs. 7.9 %;
P
= 0.094); biliary complications were especially common after peribiliary MWA (
P
= 0.002).
Conclusion
For perivascular CRLM, RFA and MWA are both safe treatment options that appear equally effective. For peribiliary CRLM, MWA has a higher complication rate than RFA, with similar efficacy. Based on these results, it is advised to use RFA for lesions in the proximity of major bile ducts.
Publisher
Springer US,Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.