Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant in irritable bowel syndrome: An update based on meta‐analysis of randomized control trials
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant in irritable bowel syndrome: An update based on meta‐analysis of randomized control trials
Do you wish to request the book?
Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant in irritable bowel syndrome: An update based on meta‐analysis of randomized control trials
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant in irritable bowel syndrome: An update based on meta‐analysis of randomized control trials
2022
Overview
Background and Aims Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) is a potential treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Several randomized trials have tested FMT effects using different routes of administration, doses, and sample sizes. We aim to assess the overall efficacy of FMT for IBS patients and the safety of the intervention. Methods We systematically searched four databases for randomized control trials that studied the efficacy and safety of FMT in IBS patients. Results We included 8 randomized trials (472 patients) that compared FMT with placebo in IBS patients. Pooled results showed no statistically significant difference between FMT and control groups in the overall change in IBS symptom severity (IBS‐SSS) at 1 month (p = 0.94), 3/4 months (p = 0.82), and at the end of trials (p = 0.67). No significant difference in the total number of respondents between the FMT and control groups (risk ratios = 1.84, [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82–2.65], p = 0.19). Although the oral route of administration showed a significant difference in the number of respondents (p = 0.004), there was no statistically significant difference in the IBS‐SSS when subgrouping the oral route of administration (mean difference = 47.57, [95% CI = −8.74–103.87], p = 0.10). Conclusion FMT is not an effective treatment to relieve all the symptoms of IBS. Even in the groups that showed relatively significant improvement after FMT, the effect was proven to wear off over time and the re‐administration carries a low success rate. Future research should consider different bacterial‐based interventions such as probiotics or specific antibiotics.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc,Wiley
Subject
