MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A multicenter cross-sectional survey of dry eye clinical characteristics and practice patterns in Korea: the DECS-K study
A multicenter cross-sectional survey of dry eye clinical characteristics and practice patterns in Korea: the DECS-K study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A multicenter cross-sectional survey of dry eye clinical characteristics and practice patterns in Korea: the DECS-K study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A multicenter cross-sectional survey of dry eye clinical characteristics and practice patterns in Korea: the DECS-K study
A multicenter cross-sectional survey of dry eye clinical characteristics and practice patterns in Korea: the DECS-K study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A multicenter cross-sectional survey of dry eye clinical characteristics and practice patterns in Korea: the DECS-K study
A multicenter cross-sectional survey of dry eye clinical characteristics and practice patterns in Korea: the DECS-K study
Journal Article

A multicenter cross-sectional survey of dry eye clinical characteristics and practice patterns in Korea: the DECS-K study

2021
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose To compare the proportions of patients satisfying Korean dry eye guidelines and Asia Dry Eye Society (ADES) diagnostic criteria and to describe the clinical characteristics and practice patterns of dry eye patients in Korea. Study design Prospective observational study. Methods This study enrolled 160 patients, with 158 patients analyzed. ADES guidelines were applied to dry eye patients satisfying the Korean dry eye guidelines. Risk factors for dry eye (e.g. visual display terminal [VDT] use) were evaluated. Dry eye subtypes were categorized as aqueous-deficient or evaporative. Objective signs (e.g. corneal and keratoconjunctival staining scores, tear break-up time [TBUT], and Schirmer test) and symptoms (Dry Eye-Related Quality of Life Score [DEQS] and Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI] questionnaire) were evaluated. Treatment patterns were also recorded. Results Patients (mean age 43.1 years) were mainly women (85.4%), with a high proportion (77.2%) of VDT users. Concordance between Korean and ADES guidelines was high (94.3%), with most patients (94.3%) having tear film instability (TBUT ≤ 5 s). Evaporative dry eye occurred in 60.1% and aqueous-deficient in 39.9% of cases. Objective signs were significantly better in evaporative than in aqueous-deficient dry eye. The DEQS bothersome ocular symptoms’ score was significantly higher in VDT users than in non-users. OSDI symptom severity and DEQS were significantly correlated ( p  < 0.001). The most common treatments were hyaluronic acid (33.5%) and diquafosol (15.2%), the latter used mainly for mild and evaporative dry eye. Conclusion The study showed high concordance between Korean and ADES diagnostic guidelines, with most patients having tear film instability.