Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
What Factors Influence Non-Participation Most in Colorectal Cancer Screening? A Discrete Choice Experiment
by
Buis, Sylvia
, Bindels, Patrick
, Jonker, Marcel F.
, Huisman, Jan
, Donkers, Bas
, Veldwijk, Jorien
, de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
in
Clinical decision making
/ Colonoscopy
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Communication
/ Decision making
/ Experiments
/ Focus groups
/ Health Administration
/ Health Economics
/ Health education
/ Health literacy
/ Intervention
/ Medical screening
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Original
/ Original Research Article
/ Participation
/ Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes
/ Preferences
/ Public Health
/ Quality of Life Research
/ Questionnaires
2021
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
What Factors Influence Non-Participation Most in Colorectal Cancer Screening? A Discrete Choice Experiment
by
Buis, Sylvia
, Bindels, Patrick
, Jonker, Marcel F.
, Huisman, Jan
, Donkers, Bas
, Veldwijk, Jorien
, de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
in
Clinical decision making
/ Colonoscopy
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Communication
/ Decision making
/ Experiments
/ Focus groups
/ Health Administration
/ Health Economics
/ Health education
/ Health literacy
/ Intervention
/ Medical screening
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Original
/ Original Research Article
/ Participation
/ Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes
/ Preferences
/ Public Health
/ Quality of Life Research
/ Questionnaires
2021
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
What Factors Influence Non-Participation Most in Colorectal Cancer Screening? A Discrete Choice Experiment
by
Buis, Sylvia
, Bindels, Patrick
, Jonker, Marcel F.
, Huisman, Jan
, Donkers, Bas
, Veldwijk, Jorien
, de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
in
Clinical decision making
/ Colonoscopy
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Communication
/ Decision making
/ Experiments
/ Focus groups
/ Health Administration
/ Health Economics
/ Health education
/ Health literacy
/ Intervention
/ Medical screening
/ Medicine
/ Medicine & Public Health
/ Original
/ Original Research Article
/ Participation
/ Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes
/ Preferences
/ Public Health
/ Quality of Life Research
/ Questionnaires
2021
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
What Factors Influence Non-Participation Most in Colorectal Cancer Screening? A Discrete Choice Experiment
Journal Article
What Factors Influence Non-Participation Most in Colorectal Cancer Screening? A Discrete Choice Experiment
2021
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background and Objective
Non-participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening needs to be decreased to achieve its full potential as a public health strategy. To facilitate successful implementation of CRC screening towards unscreened individuals, this study aimed to quantify the impact of screening and individual characteristics on non-participation in CRC screening.
Methods
An online discrete choice experiment partly based on qualitative research was used among 406 representatives of the Dutch general population aged 55–75 years. In the discrete choice experiment, respondents were offered a series of choices between CRC screening scenarios that differed on five characteristics: effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical screening test, risk of a false-negative outcome, test frequency, waiting time for faecal immunochemical screening test results and waiting time for a colonoscopy follow-up test. The discrete choice experiment data were analysed in a systematic manner using random-utility-maximisation choice processes with scale and/or preference heterogeneity (based on 15 individual characteristics) and/or random intercepts.
Results
Screening characteristics proved to influence non-participation in CRC screening (21.7–28.0% non-participation rate), but an individual’s characteristics had an even higher impact on CRC screening non-participation (8.4–75.5% non-participation rate); particularly the individual’s attitude towards CRC screening followed by whether the individual had participated in a cancer screening programme before, the decision style of the individual and the educational level of the individual. Our findings provided a high degree of confidence in the internal–external validity.
Conclusions
This study showed that although screening characteristics proved to influence non-participation in CRC screening, a respondent’s characteristics had a much higher impact on CRC screening non-participation. Policy makers and physicians can use our study insights to improve and tailor their communication plans regarding (CRC) screening for unscreened individuals.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.