Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information
by
Wahlheim, Christopher N.
in
Adult
/ Amnesia
/ Attention - physiology
/ Behavioral Science and Psychology
/ Changes
/ Cognitive Psychology
/ Cued recall
/ Cues
/ Experiments
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Information
/ Information sources
/ Learning
/ Learning transfer
/ Male
/ Manipulation
/ Mental Recall - physiology
/ Neuropsychological Tests
/ Paired-Associate Learning - physiology
/ Paradigms
/ Proactive Inhibition
/ Psychology
/ Recall
/ Task analysis
/ Tests
/ Young Adult
2015
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information
by
Wahlheim, Christopher N.
in
Adult
/ Amnesia
/ Attention - physiology
/ Behavioral Science and Psychology
/ Changes
/ Cognitive Psychology
/ Cued recall
/ Cues
/ Experiments
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Information
/ Information sources
/ Learning
/ Learning transfer
/ Male
/ Manipulation
/ Mental Recall - physiology
/ Neuropsychological Tests
/ Paired-Associate Learning - physiology
/ Paradigms
/ Proactive Inhibition
/ Psychology
/ Recall
/ Task analysis
/ Tests
/ Young Adult
2015
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information
by
Wahlheim, Christopher N.
in
Adult
/ Amnesia
/ Attention - physiology
/ Behavioral Science and Psychology
/ Changes
/ Cognitive Psychology
/ Cued recall
/ Cues
/ Experiments
/ Female
/ Humans
/ Information
/ Information sources
/ Learning
/ Learning transfer
/ Male
/ Manipulation
/ Mental Recall - physiology
/ Neuropsychological Tests
/ Paired-Associate Learning - physiology
/ Paradigms
/ Proactive Inhibition
/ Psychology
/ Recall
/ Task analysis
/ Tests
/ Young Adult
2015
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information
Journal Article
Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information
2015
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Testing initially learned information before presenting new information has been shown to counteract the deleterious effects of proactive interference by segregating competing sources of information. The present experiments were conducted to demonstrate that testing can also have its effects in part by integrating competing information. Variations of classic A–B, A–D paired-associate learning paradigms were employed that included two lists of word pairs and a cued-recall test. Repeated pairs appeared in both lists (A–B, A–B), control pairs appeared in List 2 only (A–B, C–D), and changed pairs appeared with the same cue in both lists but with different responses (A–B, A–D). The critical manipulation was whether pairs were tested or restudied in an interpolated phase that occurred between Lists 1 and 2. On a final cued-recall test, participants recalled List 2 responses and then indicated when they recollected that responses had earlier changed between lists. The change recollection measure indexed the extent to which competing responses were integrated during List 2. Change was recollected more often for tested than for restudied pairs. Proactive facilitation was obtained in cued recall when change was recollected, whereas proactive interference was obtained when change was not recollected. These results provide evidence that testing counteracted proactive interference in part by making List 1 responses more accessible during List 2, thus promoting integration and increasing later recollection of change. These results have theoretical implications because they show that testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating or segregating competing information.
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.