Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Performance determinants of unsupervised clustering methods for microbiome data
by
Do, Kim-Anh
, Zhang, Liangliang
, Shi, Yushu
, Jenq, Robert R.
, Peterson, Christine B.
in
Algorithms
/ Beta diversity
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Biomedicine
/ Bray Curtis distance
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Clustering
/ Datasets
/ Machine learning
/ Medical Microbiology
/ Methodology
/ Microbial Ecology
/ Microbial Genetics and Genomics
/ Microbiology
/ Microbiomes
/ Microbiota - genetics
/ Phylogenetics
/ Unsupervised clustering
/ Unweighted UniFrac distance
/ Virology
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Performance determinants of unsupervised clustering methods for microbiome data
by
Do, Kim-Anh
, Zhang, Liangliang
, Shi, Yushu
, Jenq, Robert R.
, Peterson, Christine B.
in
Algorithms
/ Beta diversity
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Biomedicine
/ Bray Curtis distance
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Clustering
/ Datasets
/ Machine learning
/ Medical Microbiology
/ Methodology
/ Microbial Ecology
/ Microbial Genetics and Genomics
/ Microbiology
/ Microbiomes
/ Microbiota - genetics
/ Phylogenetics
/ Unsupervised clustering
/ Unweighted UniFrac distance
/ Virology
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Performance determinants of unsupervised clustering methods for microbiome data
by
Do, Kim-Anh
, Zhang, Liangliang
, Shi, Yushu
, Jenq, Robert R.
, Peterson, Christine B.
in
Algorithms
/ Beta diversity
/ Bioinformatics
/ Biomedical and Life Sciences
/ Biomedicine
/ Bray Curtis distance
/ Cluster Analysis
/ Clustering
/ Datasets
/ Machine learning
/ Medical Microbiology
/ Methodology
/ Microbial Ecology
/ Microbial Genetics and Genomics
/ Microbiology
/ Microbiomes
/ Microbiota - genetics
/ Phylogenetics
/ Unsupervised clustering
/ Unweighted UniFrac distance
/ Virology
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Performance determinants of unsupervised clustering methods for microbiome data
Journal Article
Performance determinants of unsupervised clustering methods for microbiome data
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background
In microbiome data analysis, unsupervised clustering is often used to identify naturally occurring clusters, which can then be assessed for associations with characteristics of interest. In this work, we systematically compared beta diversity and clustering methods commonly used in microbiome analyses. We applied these to four published datasets where highly distinct microbiome profiles could be seen between sample groups, as well a clinical dataset with less clear separation between groups.
Results
Although no single method outperformed the others consistently, we did identify the key scenarios where certain methods can underperform. Specifically, the Bray Curtis (BC) metric resulted in poor clustering in a dataset where high-abundance OTUs were relatively rare. In contrast, the unweighted UniFrac (UU) metric clustered poorly on dataset with a high prevalence of low-abundance OTUs. To explore these hypotheses about BC and UU, we systematically modified the properties of the poorly performing datasets and found that this approach resulted in improved BC and UU performance. Based on these observations, we rationally combined BC and UU to generate a novel metric. We tested its performance while varying the relative contributions of each metric and also compared it with another combined metric, the generalized UniFrac distance. The proposed metric showed high performance across all datasets.
Conclusions
Our systematic evaluation of clustering performance in these five datasets demonstrates that there is no existing clustering method that universally performs best across all datasets. We propose a combined metric of BC and UU that capitalizes on the complementary strengths of the two metrics.
syUurMUnqpLuEn-KfNXmw
Video abstract
Publisher
BioMed Central,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.