Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of cooking emissions mitigation between automated and manually operated air quality interventions in one-bedroom apartments
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of cooking emissions mitigation between automated and manually operated air quality interventions in one-bedroom apartments
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of cooking emissions mitigation between automated and manually operated air quality interventions in one-bedroom apartments
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Comparison of cooking emissions mitigation between automated and manually operated air quality interventions in one-bedroom apartments
2024
Overview
We implemented a crossover study design exposing 15 participants to two indoor air quality conditions in the Well Living Lab. The first condition, the Standard Control Condition, resembled the ventilation and air supply of a typical home in the USA with a manually operated stove hood. The second condition, Advanced Control, had an automated: (i) stove hood, (ii) two portable air cleaners (PAC), and (iii) bathroom exhaust. The PM
2.5
sensors were placed in the kitchen, living room, bedroom, and bathroom. Once the sensor detected a PM
2.5
level of 15 μg/m
3
or higher, an air quality intervention (stove hood, PAC or bathroom exhaust) in that space was activated and turned off when the corresponding PM
2.5
sensor had three consecutive readings below 6 μg/m
3
. Advanced Control in the overall apartment reduced PM
2.5
concentration by 40% compared to the Standard Control. The PM
2.5
concentration difference between Advanced and Standard Control was ~ 20% in the kitchen. This can be attributed to using the stove hood manually in 66.5% of cooking PM
2.5
emission events for 323.6 h compared to 88 h stove hood used in automated mode alongside 61.9 h and 33.7 h of PAC use in living room and bedroom, respectively.
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
