Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of Raw Acceleration from the GENEA and ActiGraph™ GT3X+ Activity Monitors
by
John, Dinesh
, Mavilia, Marianna
, Sasaki, Jeffer
, Freedson, Patty
, Staudenmayer, John
in
Acceleration
/ Accuracy
/ Adult
/ Exercise
/ Humans
/ Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation
/ Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods
/ Motor Activity - physiology
/ physical activity
/ raw acceleration
/ Sensors
/ Signal processing
/ Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
/ wearable activity monitors
/ Young Adult
2013
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of Raw Acceleration from the GENEA and ActiGraph™ GT3X+ Activity Monitors
by
John, Dinesh
, Mavilia, Marianna
, Sasaki, Jeffer
, Freedson, Patty
, Staudenmayer, John
in
Acceleration
/ Accuracy
/ Adult
/ Exercise
/ Humans
/ Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation
/ Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods
/ Motor Activity - physiology
/ physical activity
/ raw acceleration
/ Sensors
/ Signal processing
/ Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
/ wearable activity monitors
/ Young Adult
2013
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of Raw Acceleration from the GENEA and ActiGraph™ GT3X+ Activity Monitors
by
John, Dinesh
, Mavilia, Marianna
, Sasaki, Jeffer
, Freedson, Patty
, Staudenmayer, John
in
Acceleration
/ Accuracy
/ Adult
/ Exercise
/ Humans
/ Monitoring, Ambulatory - instrumentation
/ Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods
/ Motor Activity - physiology
/ physical activity
/ raw acceleration
/ Sensors
/ Signal processing
/ Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
/ wearable activity monitors
/ Young Adult
2013
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of Raw Acceleration from the GENEA and ActiGraph™ GT3X+ Activity Monitors
Journal Article
Comparison of Raw Acceleration from the GENEA and ActiGraph™ GT3X+ Activity Monitors
2013
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose: To compare raw acceleration output of the ActiGraph™ GT3X+ and GENEA activity monitors. Methods: A GT3X+ and GENEA were oscillated in an orbital shaker at frequencies ranging from 0.7 to 4.0 Hz (ten 2-min trials/frequency) on a fixed radius of 5.08 cm. Additionally, 10 participants (age = 23.8 ± 5.4 years) wore the GT3X+ and GENEA on the dominant wrist and performed treadmill walking (2.0 and 3.5 mph) and running (5.5 and 7.5 mph) and simulated free-living activities (computer work, cleaning a room, vacuuming and throwing a ball) for 2-min each. A linear mixed model was used to compare the mean triaxial vector magnitude (VM) from the GT3X+ and GENEA at each oscillation frequency. For the human testing protocol, random forest machine-learning technique was used to develop two models using frequency domain (FD) and time domain (TD) features for each monitor. We compared activity type recognition accuracy between the GT3X+ and GENEA when the prediction model was fit using one monitor and then applied to the other. Z-statistics were used to compare the proportion of accurate predictions from the GT3X+ and GENEA for each model. Results: GENEA produced significantly higher (p < 0.05, 3.5 to 6.2%) mean VM than GT3X+ at all frequencies during shaker testing. Training the model using TD input features on the GENEA and applied to GT3X+ data yielded significantly lower (p < 0.05) prediction accuracy. Prediction accuracy was not compromised when interchangeably using FD models between monitors. Conclusions: It may be inappropriate to apply a model developed on the GENEA to predict activity type using GT3X+ data when input features are TD attributes of raw acceleration.
Publisher
MDPI AG,Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.