Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning
by
Tauber, Sarah K.
, Dunlosky, John
, Mueller, Michael L.
in
Association
/ Behavioral Science and Psychology
/ Biological and medical sciences
/ Brief Report
/ Cognitive Psychology
/ Cues
/ Debates
/ Design of experiments
/ Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
/ Human
/ Humans
/ Influence
/ Judgment - physiology
/ Learning - physiology
/ Learning. Memory
/ Memory
/ Memory - physiology
/ Mental Recall
/ Psychology
/ Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
/ Psychology. Psychophysiology
/ Reading
/ Studies
2013
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning
by
Tauber, Sarah K.
, Dunlosky, John
, Mueller, Michael L.
in
Association
/ Behavioral Science and Psychology
/ Biological and medical sciences
/ Brief Report
/ Cognitive Psychology
/ Cues
/ Debates
/ Design of experiments
/ Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
/ Human
/ Humans
/ Influence
/ Judgment - physiology
/ Learning - physiology
/ Learning. Memory
/ Memory
/ Memory - physiology
/ Mental Recall
/ Psychology
/ Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
/ Psychology. Psychophysiology
/ Reading
/ Studies
2013
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning
by
Tauber, Sarah K.
, Dunlosky, John
, Mueller, Michael L.
in
Association
/ Behavioral Science and Psychology
/ Biological and medical sciences
/ Brief Report
/ Cognitive Psychology
/ Cues
/ Debates
/ Design of experiments
/ Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
/ Human
/ Humans
/ Influence
/ Judgment - physiology
/ Learning - physiology
/ Learning. Memory
/ Memory
/ Memory - physiology
/ Mental Recall
/ Psychology
/ Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
/ Psychology. Psychophysiology
/ Reading
/ Studies
2013
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning
Journal Article
Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning
2013
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Discovering how people judge their memories has been a major issue for metacognitive research for over 4 decades; many factors have been discovered that affect people’s judgments, but exactly how those effects are mediated is poorly understood. For instance, the effect of word pair relatedness on judgments of learning (JOLs) has been repeatedly demonstrated, yet the underlying basis of this substantial effect is currently unknown. Thus, in three experiments, we assessed the contribution of beliefs and processing fluency. In Experiment
1
, participants studied related and unrelated word pairs and made either prestudy JOLs or immediate JOLs. Participants gave higher estimates for related than for unrelated pairs, suggesting that participants’ beliefs at least partially drive the relatedness effect on JOLs. Next, we evaluated the contribution of processing fluency to the relatedness effect either (1) by disrupting fluency by presenting half the pairs in an aLtErNaTiNg format (Experiment
2
) or (2) by measuring how fluently participants processed pairs at study and statistically estimating the degree to which conceptual fluency mediated the effects of relatedness on JOLs (Experiment
3
). Results from both experiments indicated that fluency contributes minimally to the relatedness effect. Taken together, these results indicate that people’s beliefs about how relatedness influences memory are responsible for mediating the relationship between relatedness and JOLs. In general, empirically establishing what mediates the effects of other factors on people’s judgments remains a major agenda for advancing theory of metacognitive monitoring.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag,Springer,Springer Nature B.V
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.